Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.
Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned so many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)
Carl Bergstrom notes a publicity stunt by Anthropic:
āThe AI Grad Studentā: A Harvard professor describes working with Claude.
Early on, he describes misconduct that would cause any student to be terminated: āIt faked results, hoping I wouldnāt notice.ā
But he ends the essay with āNow Iām doing 100% of my research with LLMsā.
Am I losing my mind?
Hang around for the ātrust me bro, I saw it on YouTubeā guy in the comments.
when Bergstrom came to campus last year, he mentioned that he wargamed a pandemic response with vaccinations for the Bush administration, and they were worried enough about people raiding vaccine trucks, mad max style, that they planned for all these armed escorts.
⦠instead we get to live in eddington.
Iāve been rewatching ReGenesis and you can sorta see a similar background to it (it being of the same vintage): bio attacks are the Big Bad, thereās actual mobilisation against viral spread, etc
kinda whiplash just how fucking rapidly the antivaxxer movement (and general anti-science) managed to spread and become popular in the years hence (and specifically circa the ~2016 mark)
As a counterpoint, thereās a local outbreak of meningitis in Kent (UK) and panicked kids are lining up for vaccinations there.
COVID mostly hit the invisible elderly. Itās hard to imagine what would have happened if kids 0-6 were the most vulnerable.
oh sure, I didnāt mean to imply that good isnāt happening, more observing on how far and popular the whackjobs have managed to come
People are trying to get vaccinations for that here in .nl (as in one other country it already spread to a university iirc, so not totally unwise)
Over here, measles hits mostly kids, but if anything, the new measles epidemic seems to have made antivaxxers double down.
Yeah itās tragic, but I think it can be āexplainedā in that incorrect idea that measles isnāt that bad, really, and it was ānaturalā to get it. I donāt know the exact lethality differences between the diseases in question - just that for an otherwise healthy 20 year old university student, being forced to stay at home because of a disease mostly killing octogenarians is easier to protest against than something thatās killing you and your fellow ravers.
I saw this headline:
Engineer Says Itās Time to Rebuild the Twin Towers With Giant Data Centers, Huge Tech Labs, and Anti-Aircraft Lasers on the Roof
And thought nothing in the body of the article could possibly top the headline. I was wrong:
Now, a long-shot effort seeks to rebuild them in an unlikely locale: Chicago
heās even gone so far as to get a tribute to the original World Trade Center tattooed on his arm.
fireproof steel I-beams
a dedicated fire department
Journalists know that they donāt have to cover every random crank on the internet right? I suppose itās my own fault for clicking on it.
Misaligned incentives. You read the news to be informed. Journalists write "news* to generate clicks and ātry to go viralā
I agree though, It would be great if they didnāt provide oxygen to these flaming idiots
Depriving the steel beams of oxygen would help tooā¦
I donāt know, I think thereās real value in allowing the public to keep an eye on aspiring supervillains.
Chicago always wanted a 9/11 of its own.
Usenet used to be there for guys like this
I⦠āFireproof steel I-beamsā has to be taking the piss, right? Right???
do they know that doing this wonāt solve their NYSE link latency problem?
āGitHub opted everyone into [ai] training.ā
You have till 24 April to opt out.
The title is Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang says āI think weāve achieved AGIā. He then seemed to slightly walk back the claim, but it might be slightly more accurate to say that:
āHuang said weāve achieved AGI. Because he thinks everyone except him is a replaceable idiotā
Apropos of nothing, archive.is ddos-d a website and altered page snapshots as part of some sort of inscrutable net drama causing Wikipedia to stop using it.
So if anyone cares about such things hereās a wayback machine link instead
That said: lmao. Where are all these billion dollar LLM-run Tamogotchi feeding startups hiding? Still in the strawberry counting phase of starting a business?
āCongratulations guys, we did it. Job well done. Youāre all fired.ā
Is it āWe achieved AGI, the Machine is now Consciousā Day again already? It comes around so fast
requiescat in picem, sora
more like requie-SCAT, am i right
āAI is here to stayā the AI:
reportedly they dropped the whole video thing, including from chatgpt.
Requiescat en urina, more like. Does that make the first of this generation of slopmakers to actually get shut down?
their deal with Disney is also over, so hooray!
A friend of mine is working on an internal AI chatbot at their company, so that the Least-Productive Team will have something to answer the same 5 questions that they keep asking to Friendās (extremely productive) team, instead of wasting Friend et alās time.
So I guess thatās the one use case of AI bots: to dangle keys in front of MBAs who are too stupid to do their own jobs. Which explains everything, really.
Yeah, almost the entirety of use cases for genai chatbots is contempt for oneās customers.
Hey, itās not just that, thatās unfair to the chatbots. Theyāre also used out of contempt for oneās employees
Ah, of course! I come from a corp culture where co-workers were also called customers (āusersā actually but you know)
is that some MLM shit or something?
On one hand, no, itās an inevitable consequence of a company becoming so large that it needs a department to manage its internal infrastructure. When I worked at Google, my customers were Googlers; that is, the services I owned were only queried by fellow employees. On the other hand, books like The Circle are popular precisely because they capture the quasi-cult vibe of working at places like Google.
right, I forgot you could build things for internal use
I built an open-source connector between MyChart and Claude : /r/healthIT (edit: Archive copy)
my jaw is on the fucking floor
The Tumblr thread about covers it, but I had a quick look through the code and this caught my attention in the get2fa.ts file. Itās used in Authorisation headers for
https://api.resend.com/emailsrequests. Iāve never used an aws secretsmanager but Iām pretty sure this is a no.const RESEND_API_KEY_SECRET_ARN = 'arn:aws:secretsmanager:us-east-2:<REDACTED_HARDCODED_STRING>:secret:RESEND_API_KEY-<REDACTED_HARDCODED_STRING>';const result = execSync( 'aws secretsmanager get-secret-value --secret-id "${RESEND_API_KEY_SECRET_ARN}" --region us-east-2 --profile <REDACTED_HARDCODED_STRING> --query SecretString --output text', { encoding: 'utf-8' } ).trim();šµāš«
Oh jolly canāt wait for this to go viral enough that my boss schedules time to ask me about it.
The tumblr thread is a must read if youāve ever been near HIPAA regulated infrastructure.
You know, when I think about securely holding onto things and protecting them without damaging or dropping them, I think of a fucking OPEN CLAW said nobody ever.
A lesswronger asks are
werationalfic protagonists the baddies? https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FuGfR3jL3sw6r8kB4/richard-ngo-s-shortform?commentId=uDuzmfMEvEqpyApLhtldr; rationalfic has a very common trend of the protagonist gaining and using overwhelming power to radically reform the world. This is almost (with a few notable exceptions) portrayed as clearly unambiguously good thing.
My take: Donāt get me wrong, the Wizarding World (for example), as canonically portrayed needs some very strong reforms if not an entire revolution. But rationalfic almost never portrays the slow hard work of building support networks and alliances and developing a materialist theoretical understanding of how to reform society, as opposed to a lone (or small friend group) rationalist hero finding some overwhelming magical or technological advantage they can use to single-handedly take control and use their rationalist intellect to unilaterally fix everything. Part of it is the normal disconnect of fiction to the real world were it is more narrative satisfying (and easier to write) to have a central protagonist the solves the major problems or is at least directly involved with them, and rationalfic involves that protagonist gaining even more agency than they canonically do. The problem is that rationalist take this attitude back into real life, and so end up idolizing mythologized techbro billionaires or venture capitalist or the myth of the lone genius scientist/inventor.
Also, quality sneer in the replies, ārationalā teletubbies: https://tomasbjartur.bearblog.dev/rational-teletubbies/
Part of what makes the RatFic version of this so weird imo is that despite being ostensibly rooted in relatively low-hanging fruit (e.g. what if we industrialized this pre modern setting, what if we rationally looked at the rules of this magic system, etc.) nobody other than the protagonist has ever thought about these things and even once the protagonist starts demonstrating some real world-conquering results (benevolently, of course) nobody ever really seems to want to copy their successes. Part of what made the actual industrial revolution unfold the way it did was because of the ensuing arms race of it. In addition to causing the lines on various economistās charts to go nearly vertical this also basically culminated in the first world war, which seems like the kind of event that they should be aware of. But of course in RatFic it seems like anyone who canāt be talked around to joining up with our protagonist is too weak or woke or stupid to actually pose a threat to the Glorious March of Rational Progress.
Once you commit to the idea that only your main characters have ever tried to study magic scientifically, youāre locked in to making all the rest of the magical world into dullards. (Really, no other eleven-year-olds were ever into computer programming, chemistry sets, exotic marine animals, outer space, or dinosaurs?) Or, to look at it another way, the only way you can find the premise plausible is if youāre already inclined to dismiss most of humanity as āNPCsā.
Being the kind of writer I am, whenever this comes up I am tempted to suggest ways it could have been done better. But, first, I am not glazing the work of Rowling, even indirectly, no way, no how. Fuck her for all the pain she has wrought, and fuck the whole LessWrong crew for tacitly accepting it. Second, HPMoR was cult shit all along, not meant to teach science but to sow distrust of scientists under the glossy sheen of being able to name the six quarks.
I have also occasionally been tempted to try and get a Goncharov thing going, where everyone collectively recalls that Tommy Berry and the Forevernight Forest got them into reading.
It was just after an ordinary afternoon tea, on an ordinary Sunday, the first cold day of autumn, when Tommy Berry discovered that Time was no longer adding up in the ordinary way.
Tommy had only managed to drink one cup of very indifferently warm tea, and eat the last plain saltine from the bottom of the bag. Everything else had been gobbled up or drunk down by his uncle Myrvold, who was rotund as a boulder and about as kind, and his step-aunt Meredith, who was thin as a snake and considerably more mean. So, yes, it was altogether quite the ordinary teatime.
Tommy had a secret, you see. In fact, he had two, a big one that he knew about and an even bigger one that was just about to fall on top of him.
His first secret was that he had a library card. He had stolen an adultās library card. Or that is how Uncle Myrvold and Step-Aunt Meredith would have described it, if they knew.
Carruthers, who lived down the end of the lane and always yelled at Tommy to mind his hedges, and who let his dog chase Tommy and the other children, had made a big show of throwing his library card into the roadway because, he said, the library was full of immoral books. A car had then driven over it, and then a whole lorry, and then Tommy had snatched it up. Something told him that anything Carruthers hated, he should save, and anything that Myrvold and Meredith would be angry about, he should hold onto.
Tommy had heard adults say that something was āburning a hole in my pocketā. He wondered if this was what that meant. It felt like he was carrying a hot coal in the pocket of his threadbare corduroy jacket, and no one could know.
The library had a new machine. He had seen adults use it. You could go up to it, wave a book under a red laser light like at the grocery store, then show the machine your card, and it would check out the book for you. Tommy made a plan. He would slip out of the house just after tea. He would walk the five blocks to the library. He would find a book that Myrvold and Meredith and Carruthers and every other grownup would not want him to read. He would wait until the librarian was busy dealing with a whole queue of people. And then he would use the machine.
Everything went perfectly until the very last step.
There was a girl at the machine.
He had a big fat book in his hands, a book he had picked because it had āMurderā in the title and would last a long time, and there was a girl in front of him at the library machine.
āMurder at Wizard University?ā she asked him, right to his face, like they had already been introduced, like they had known each other since nursery school. āThatās not a book for little kids.ā His stomach dropped, right into his feet. He didnāt know that a stomach could do such a thing.
And then she tilted the stack of books she was carrying toward him, showing him the titles on their spines. āNeither are these,ā she said.
And she pulled out her own library card. It was black, like a rectangle cut out of the midnight sky.
Thatās all I wrote in the thread that prompted me to take a stab. Oh, I think I had decided that the girlās name is Elfriede? And the principal of magic school is nonbinary.
āWhy, of course thereās a potion for changing,ā said Professor Shade. āThat is what potions do. I donāt know where Iād be without it. It is ever so helpful to reach the top shelf, but on the other hand, menās fashions havenāt been truly swank in a hundred fifty years.ā
AO3 this immediately
Fuck it, Iām good to Gonch this out.
I forget, did we ever actually learn who the killer was in Murder at Wizard University? I remember it kept coming up through the first book as a kind of motif for how this new world wasnāt necessarily as safe and clean as Tommy expected, but I think that whole business with the Thoughtknot ended up overshadowing it before the actual killer was revealed. Like, I get it thematically or whatever but it just stuck in my head as a loose thread and has bugged me for years.
Subscribed
Being the kind of writer I am, whenever this comes up I am tempted to suggest ways it could have been done better.
The premise kind of does work in a setting like Harry Potter, the wizarding world is insular enough that a clever kid could bring in some new ideas. The problem is Eliezer wanted to throw in too many shortcuts. Its not enough for creativity with transmutations to give the protagonist a small edge, transmutation is made into the ultimate all-purpose spell so the protagonist can exploit it easier. The protagonist isnāt just moderately better at Patronus with some muggle psychology, his patronus can kill dementors. And the philosopherās stone is changed into some ancient atlantean super-magic, because fuck wizards ever inventing anything, and also instead of some moderate rate of its typical mythological powers it is super transmutation.
But, first, I am not glazing the work of Rowling, even indirectly, no way, no how.
Rowling went mask off transphobe in 2018, HPMOR finished in 2015. So I wonāt blame Eliezer for not picking a different fandom at the time. Eliezer has actually said moderately supportive comments, including of using peopleās preferred pronouns (weāve mocked another lesswronger for writing long screeds complaining about this). In general, I think the average lesswrong attitude towards trans people is better than the average Americanās attitude⦠but that is because the bar is in hell. But yeah Iāve seen plenty of shitty takes towards trans people on lesswrong.
Second, HPMoR was cult shit all along, not meant to teach science but to sow distrust of scientists under the glossy sheen of being able to name the six quarks.
Yep. And it didnāt even stick to its premise of ātry to do science to magic and compare muggle scientifically gained knowledge to magicā and instead went into some Enderās game pastiche followed by Death Note style āI know you know I knowā plotting, then Harry gets handed all the magical power handed to him at the end of the story thanks to Dumbledore following some insane combination of prophecy.
To be clear, I donāt care about Yud picking the fandom he did at the time (apart from the cheapness of āplaying on easy modeā and the blatant attempt to ride popularity for propagating his cult shit). What strikes me is the silence during the time when other people are most definitely reacting:
Yeah. And it is not like Eliezer usually holds himself back from throwing out hot takes or inserting himself into conversations he is tangentially relevant to, so the silence is conspicuous in this case.
I was never on twitter. Can you point me to a concise list of what Rowling said and when she said it?
Most social media posts and online news stories just talk around what she said.
This article is where I was getting the 2018 date from: https://theweek.com/feature/1020838/jk-rowlings-transphobia-controversy-a-complete-timeline
And since in that 2018 incident Rowling was trying to backpedal/downplay it, I assume before that she was keeping the mask firmly on.
I forgot that she published novels alluding to anti-trans tropes under a male penname! Sorry Joanne āRobert Galbraithā Rowling, facts donāt care about your feelings.
The thread for collecting HPMoR sneers linked to this timeline, but itās paywalled now:
https://www.vox.com/culture/23622610/jk-rowling-transphobic-statements-timeline-history-controversy
They also donāt want to believe in chaos theory. This post tries to explain it to them, but check out Gwern in the comments being skewered by a book written by Freeman Dyson around the time he was born. They want the future to be perfectly predictable (even though Yud says that 1 and 0 are not probabilities) and they donāt like game theory, repeated games, or non-zero-sum games, because those reward people from building trust then violating it.
Gwernās been updating those comments! This was in 2023, and in 2025 he was still so mad about it that he wrote a list of ways to cheat at pinball and edited the comment to add a link.
I feel so sad because so many of his examples are ways to make people think you won. And we are about to see what happens when you take 20-30% of global fossil fuel and helium production offline for six months to a few years. Public relations and cooking the books canāt change that.
Its easy to make people believe you are wise and know the future. There is no way to predict the weather one month out much better than we can now, and if you plant your crops and the sun scorches them, those crops are dead and you have to wait until next season to replant.
On a purely rhetorical point, it seems like the whole counterargument from Gwern is just an argument-by-disorganization or something to that effect. He doesnāt actually challenge the factual information presented, but does shift how those facts are framed and what the actual contention is in the background, and then avoids actually engaging with the new contention from the bottom up.
In a lot of discussions with singularity cultists (both pros and antis) they assume that a true superintelligence would render the whole universe deterministically predictable to a sufficient degree to allow it to basically do magic. This is how the specifics of "how and why does the AI kill all humans again?ā tend to be elided, for example. This same kind of thinking is also at the heart of their obsession with āsuperpredictorsā who can, it is assumed, use some kind of trick to beat this kind of mathematical limit in certainty (this is the part where I say something about survivorship bias). In the context of that discussion, the fact that a relatively simple arrangement of components following relatively simple, deterministic rules is still not meaningfully predictable past a dozen or so sequential events due to the magnification of the inevitable error in our understanding of the initial circumstances is a logical knockout.
Rather than engage with this, however, Gwern and his compatriots in the thread focus in on the tangent about how high-level pinball players are able to control for that uncertainty by avoiding the region of the board where those error-magnifying parts are. However this is not the same argument and begs the question of whether those high-chaos areas are always avoidable as they are in a pinball machine. Rather than engage with that question, Gwern doubles down on the pinball analogy, shifting the question even further from āhow well can we predict the deterministic motion of a ball given the inevitable uncertainty of our initial stateā to āhow many ways can we convince a third party weāve gotten a high score on a pinball machineā. At this point weāre not just moving the goalposts, weāve moved the entire stadium into low earth orbit and gotten real cute about whether weāre playing š or ā½ football.
And given the conversation surrounding the thread and these topics on LW Iām not even going to assume that such a wild shift is the result of bad faith instead of simple disorganization and sloppiness of rhetoric. This is what happens to a community that conflates āit makes me feel smartā with āit actually communicates the point effectivelyā.
Gwernās turn to āwhat if I just make people believe I won at pinball?ā also come back to their idea that the smartest being is the best manipulator, even though some excellent manipulators like Trump donāt have a lot of logical-analytical intelligence, and some brilliant thinkers like John Nash get into a fight with the inside of their own head and lose. It also reminds me of how they love markets in theory but are not interested in starting a business which would compete with other businesses.
Ironically I think itās also been discussed most frequently within Rationalist circles that these types of intelligence arenāt often correlated. Iām not going to chase down links right now because doing an SSC archive exploration requires more mental fortitude than I currently possess, but I distinctly remember that a recurring theme was āif nerds are so smart why donāt they rule the world?ā In my less cynical days I had assumed that his confusion on this point was largely rhetorical, intended to illustrate some part of whatever point was buried in the beigeness. Now it seems like I was falling victim to the ability to project whatever tangentially-related thesis you want onto the essay and find supporting arguments because of how badly itās written.
The attitude that you can substitute a bunch of cheap tricks and hacks to get around fundamentally difficult problems reminds me of the techbro attitude that leads to stuff like pushing fundamentally non-viable technologies (like Theranos or the LLM boosters) and of DOGE trying to asking an LLM how to cut the DEI.
- hey chaotic systems are a thing, you canāt predict every single last detail
gwern: as a proof that youāre wrong, what if we placed everywhere very fast robots that avoid getting into chaotic systems in the first place
thereās a lot i want to pull out from this comment by ngo
first, shorn of context, i donāt know that this sort of power fantasy reflects so poorly on the rationalists. or perhaps it does, and in that case also reflects poorly on me, since itās my preferred power fantasy. the world sucks and it would be nice to magically make it better. EDIT: ok im noticing that the naruto fanfiction excerpt is just straightforwardly jerking off about doing a fascist coup
second, we must remember that rat stories are implicitly either recipes for social change or warnings that society ought to stay away from particular demons. rationalism is in large part a political movement with what they believe to be practical aims
third, if ngoās marxist fiction from the 1800s all ended with communist revolutions, the worrying thing for a member of the movement would not be a fantasy of triumph or a sense of certainty of triumph, but rather an inability to connect triumphant outcomes to action under the present conditions. as you highlighted, the fantastical element of these stories is in conflict with the practicality of their aims
fourth, as far as i can tell, that is not ngoās objection at all. what he seems to be concerned about is the possibility that rationalists will make serious progress on actually taking over the world and make terrible things happen once they do. i donāt take this possibility seriously at all. fundamentally, rationalists are lapdogs, forever licking the negligently outstretched hands of billionaires. they cause real harm as lackeys of the ultrawealthy and vectors for the diseases of racism, eugenics, etc, but to take ngoās concerns seriously i would have to buy into the same fantasy of magical omnipotence heās pointing to, because there seems to be no other path from here to rationalist dictatorship.
Your first point is true⦠with the key words being āshorn of contextā. When you look at how many ratfics go in that direction your second and fourth points become problems.
As to your fourth point⦠the techbro billionaires like Elon or Peter Thiel do like referencing fiction (often in hamfisted or ignorant ways that makes me think a bit of fandom gatekeeping actually is good sometimes⦠i.e. naming your surveillance company palantir, or naming one of your kids a nonsensical WH40K reference). So I wouldnāt entirely neglect the possibility of rationalist managing a bit of inspiration to the billionaires in between the bootlicking. And although there may not be a magical ācoup the governmentā power in real life, the influence they are trying to focus on themselves and harness is still worrying.
Iād do the usual āin celebration of Soraās death post your favourite AI slop videoā but thereās no need since we know the absolute best one so thread over
spare a thought and a prayer for all these careers of ambitious propagandists and engagement farmers, dislocated without warning
Really hope this is going to be the wave breaking, as it is getting so stupid. (Some dutch library had all its new books be ai slop (some even quite racist it seems), and this isnt a single incident).
They are now also dropping their porn chatbots. (Remember though, they were late with that, from what I heard the market on that was already filled).
So thatās like what, 90% of all usage gone
Not sure, from what I heard lot of porn people use other models anyway. Not exactly sure which models (I heard there are also places where there are jailbroken models, but im not going to look for that for obvious reasons), but from what I heard a while back grok/gemini/deepseek were popular. Low N on that however. Grok seems to be esp popular for revenge porn sort of shit however.
For example see the usage stats here for roleplay using janitor.ai (most roleplay is not erotic however (the site has no āerotic contentā tracking), but still, openAIās models are not in the top 20). This is however free vs priced models etc (and deepseek is a lot cheaper, which is important for roleplay esp if you want a history, as that context needs to be added every time (the powercost of all this must be insane)).
House of Saud (publication, not the royals) asks if the Iran war was caused by AI sycophancy.
Iām reminded of the Kremlin reality distortion field that appears to have informed the decision to invade Ukraine.
A) At this point I would be more surprised to learn that AI psychosis wasnāt infecting the upper tiers of the white house tbh. Like, at this point we could get a leak that Hegseth had been developing a literal god complex alongside his LLM mistress and I wouldnāt bat an eye.
B) It seems like a particularly bad sign that this is coming from thr Saudis given that theyāve been a consistent ally that the US has spent a lot of material resources and political capital to support. Ed: not actually an official Saudi government source. When you assume you make an ass of yourself, etc.
Not the Saudis, just a Saudi focused outlet.
That this comes from the Saudi Royal Family is especially rich because of the amount of plain-olā sycophancy around Neom.
Worthy read, but it smelled like it had been drafted by AI too. Lots of the tropes and a bit repetitive.
Also importantly, WAY too praising of Anthropic.
This account is just that sort of shit 24/7, just constant linkedin lunacy that everyone should treat as rage bait and move on.
I know, but thereās just so much to sneer at (especially lately).
I find it very unsatisfactory to sneer at skeets from the above author. Itās just junkfood at this point and not like good junkfood, just like stale off-brand popcorn in a bag that has a picture of a sad clown on it. Why is the clown sad? Because the clown has to constantly look at different variations on the same theme written by people whose brains are melted by LinkedIn.
Oh sure, but when I send a cover letter where claude code told me about serious security issues and I used that knowledge to replace their internal app portal with my face Iāve āviolated the computer fraud and abuse lawsā or whatever.
Every week I learn Iām a n00b when it comes to leveling up with Al.
Iām hiring for facilities maintenance, and specifically seeking a high-agency self-starter who can help us optimize bathroom breaks. An internal candidate sent over multiple Claude Code generated iterations of the š©emoji. One of them had blonde hair and Madonnaās famous cone bra.
I was speechless.
fresh hellish nonsense brought to you by ai-gen podcasts enabled by techbros interpretation of consent and privacy:
https://www.404media.co/this-company-is-secretly-turning-your-zoom-calls-into-ai-podcasts/
WebinarTV, a company that bills itself as āa search engine for the best webinars,ā is secretly scanning the internet for Zoom meeting links, recording the calls, and turning them into AI-generated podcasts for profit. In some cases, people only found out that their Zoom calls were recorded once WebinarTV reached out to them directly to say their call was turned into a podcast in an attempt to promote WebinarTVās services.
āWebinarTV is believed to leverage a range of browser extensions that provide functionalities such as AI powered transcription and note-taking tools, or tools to automate the joining of online meetings. The platform mostly relies on the widespread use of these tools by end users, rather than operating them directly. However, at least one of the known extensions is listed on the Chrome Web Store as developed by WebinarTV.ā
Sounds like someone in a jurisdiction which requires all-party consent to record a conversation could sue them
DeviantArt decided to make an āAI-poweredā āvideo creatorā (roughly a day before Sora got shitcanned), because its not like dA can make things worse by doubling-down on that shit. Special highlight goes to the opening of that announcement, which asks:
What if your art could (quite literally) move?
Have these people ever heard of animation
What if your art could literally move to a different platform am I right?
We shouldnāt have let them take elfwood.
E; shouldnāt not should
sneer from an unexpected source: off-broadway.
Anyone in NYC or DC get to see it?
How can I get a copy of the script, though⦠I guess you canāt just order one like a book, even my campus library said it would be tough.
Trump giving a speech at some TESCREAL-coded nonprofit thatās got someā¦interesting design in their logo
Is the 7 supposed to be a dogwhistle or something?
I mean it looks kinda swastikesque imo, especially with the ambiguity over whether itās supposed to be one or two "I"s behind it. (In some cases itās FII with the second I split, and sometimes itās FIIInstitute with the top of the second and bottom of the third āIā visible).
Their Branding Guidelines have several logos - including ones where the 7 doesnāt accidentally form a Wolfsangel/Ger-Rune/Lightening Bolt type of shape.
These AI orgs donāt get the benefit of the doubt (FYI on further investigation this looks like a Saudi outfit. Not that theyāre any better, mind you)
Ow I thought op meant meant it looks like it is going fuuuuuuā¦
















