

Hypothesis: When he wrote Surreal Numbers, Knuth was a poet and thus unknowingly of the Devilās party.


Hypothesis: When he wrote Surreal Numbers, Knuth was a poet and thus unknowingly of the Devilās party.


We really need to work harder at poisoning the training data for math problems.


My generous statement: Knuth, being a scientist, is used to an āadversaryā that plays fair. As we have known for decades, a scientist can be tricked in situations that a magician will see through. This applies all the more now with the Sycophancy Engines, which make mathematics into a casino vacation. Just one more prompt, bro. Just one more prompt.
My less generous statement: Knuth is almost 90 years old. Sure, age doesnāt imply a person will become a doddering fool, but people do tend to slow down, to have less energy and more need to spend it managing their health. āThinking about a problem for a few weeksā counts for less in a situation like that.
My extremely ungenerous statement: Hey, remember when Michael Atiyah claimed to have proved the Riemann hypothesis in 2018? And the community reaction was a pained, āAtiyah is one of the great mathematicians⦠of the 20th century.ā


I know Iāve said somewhere on here before that āHarry Potter for pop science nerdsā is fanfiction on easy mode, but Iāll stand by it.


You canāt build a fandom full of that many fucked-up people without some of them getting horny in a fucked-up way.
Edit to add: example of a non-erotic fanfic https://archiveofourown.org/works/73396436


That header pic sure takes me back


Felicitations!
(āA job,ā Blake thinks. āI need to find one of those.ā)


I would also not put my finger on those microscope slides


womp, and wait for it, womp


Do you want Tylers Durden? Because this is how you get Tylers Durden.


Train your chatbot on TV Tropes, and the password will always be swordfish.


The post names Joscha Bach as someone Aella tried to exclude.
You do not under any circumstances have to hand it to Aella


āYes, I am hammering myself in the balls. But maybe its worth it?ā


The phrase āambient AI listening in our hospitalā makes me hear the āDies Iraeā in my head.


A longread on AI greenwashing begins thusly:
The expansion of data centres - which is driven in large part by AI growth - is creating a shocking new demand for fossil fuels. The tech companies driving AI expansion try to downplay AIās proven climate impacts by claiming that AI will eventually help solve climate change. Our analysis of these claims suggests that rather than relying on credible and substantiated data, these companies are writing themselves a blank cheque to pollute on the empty promise of future salvation. While the current negative effects of AI on the climate are clear, proven and growing, the promise of large-scale solutions is often based on wishful thinking, and almost always presented with scant evidence.
(Via.)


Itās morginā time


Limor Fried and I had a class together at MIT in 2001. This has no bearing on the present circumstances and offers me no real insight (anything I could say about our extremely limited interactions would amount to confirmation bias). Itās just the odd little factoid that comes to mind whenever adafruit Does Something Online.
Revealed: UKās multibillion AI drive is built on āphantom investmentsā
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/mar/09/revealed-uks-multibillion-ai-drive-is-built-on-phantom-investments