Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.
Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful youāll near-instantly regret.
Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.
If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cutānāpaste it into its own post ā thereās no quota for posting and the bar really isnāt that high.
The post Xitter web has spawned so many āesotericā right wing freaks, but thereās no appropriate sneer-space for them. Iām talking redscare-ish, reality challenged āculture criticsā who write about everything but understand nothing. Iām talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. Theyāre inescapable at this point, yet I donāt see them mocked (as much as they should be)
Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldnāt be surgeons because they didnāt believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I canāt escape them, I would love to sneer at them.
(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this.)


Being the kind of writer I am, whenever this comes up I am tempted to suggest ways it could have been done better. But, first, I am not glazing the work of Rowling, even indirectly, no way, no how. Fuck her for all the pain she has wrought, and fuck the whole LessWrong crew for tacitly accepting it. Second, HPMoR was cult shit all along, not meant to teach science but to sow distrust of scientists under the glossy sheen of being able to name the six quarks.
I have also occasionally been tempted to try and get a Goncharov thing going, where everyone collectively recalls that Tommy Berry and the Forevernight Forest got them into reading.
Thatās all I wrote in the thread that prompted me to take a stab. Oh, I think I had decided that the girlās name is Elfriede? And the principal of magic school is nonbinary.
Fuck it, Iām good to Gonch this out.
I forget, did we ever actually learn who the killer was in Murder at Wizard University? I remember it kept coming up through the first book as a kind of motif for how this new world wasnāt necessarily as safe and clean as Tommy expected, but I think that whole business with the Thoughtknot ended up overshadowing it before the actual killer was revealed. Like, I get it thematically or whatever but it just stuck in my head as a loose thread and has bugged me for years.
Subscribed
AO3 this immediately
https://archiveofourown.org/works/82397476
The premise kind of does work in a setting like Harry Potter, the wizarding world is insular enough that a clever kid could bring in some new ideas. The problem is Eliezer wanted to throw in too many shortcuts. Its not enough for creativity with transmutations to give the protagonist a small edge, transmutation is made into the ultimate all-purpose spell so the protagonist can exploit it easier. The protagonist isnāt just moderately better at Patronus with some muggle psychology, his patronus can kill dementors. And the philosopherās stone is changed into some ancient atlantean super-magic, because fuck wizards ever inventing anything, and also instead of some moderate rate of its typical mythological powers it is super transmutation.
Rowling went mask off transphobe in 2018, HPMOR finished in 2015. So I wonāt blame Eliezer for not picking a different fandom at the time. Eliezer has actually said moderately supportive comments, including of using peopleās preferred pronouns (weāve mocked another lesswronger for writing long screeds complaining about this). In general, I think the average lesswrong attitude towards trans people is better than the average Americanās attitude⦠but that is because the bar is in hell. But yeah Iāve seen plenty of shitty takes towards trans people on lesswrong.
Yep. And it didnāt even stick to its premise of ātry to do science to magic and compare muggle scientifically gained knowledge to magicā and instead went into some Enderās game pastiche followed by Death Note style āI know you know I knowā plotting, then Harry gets handed all the magical power handed to him at the end of the story thanks to Dumbledore following some insane combination of prophecy.
To be clear, I donāt care about Yud picking the fandom he did at the time (apart from the cheapness of āplaying on easy modeā and the blatant attempt to ride popularity for propagating his cult shit). What strikes me is the silence during the time when other people are most definitely reacting:
https://awful.systems/post/5169331/8248381
Yeah. And it is not like Eliezer usually holds himself back from throwing out hot takes or inserting himself into conversations he is tangentially relevant to, so the silence is conspicuous in this case.
I was never on twitter. Can you point me to a concise list of what Rowling said and when she said it?
Most social media posts and online news stories just talk around what she said.
This article is where I was getting the 2018 date from: https://theweek.com/feature/1020838/jk-rowlings-transphobia-controversy-a-complete-timeline
And since in that 2018 incident Rowling was trying to backpedal/downplay it, I assume before that she was keeping the mask firmly on.
I forgot that she published novels alluding to anti-trans tropes under a male penname! Sorry Joanne āRobert Galbraithā Rowling, facts donāt care about your feelings.
The thread for collecting HPMoR sneers linked to this timeline, but itās paywalled now:
https://www.vox.com/culture/23622610/jk-rowling-transphobic-statements-timeline-history-controversy