Das man sich gerade auf einem niedrigeren Niveau einpendelt als früher halte ich auch für plausibel. Mit Produktivitätsanstieg hat das aber wenig zu tun.

Da ist nichts spannendes passiert. Professionelle Grafikdesigner werden nicht von Software die funktioniert zu Sloposhop wechseln. Wer eine zuverlässige FOSS Version möchte geht immer noch besser zu Krita oder GIMP.

Etwas Kontext zum Kontext: Als ich noch beruflich mit Leuten zu tun hatte, die ständig allen erklären wollten, dass die Blockchain die Zukunft ist, wurde auch gern das Internet als Vergleich herangezogen.

Eine zuverlässige Quelle zu finden war mir zu viel Aufwand. Ich weiß mittlerweile garnicht ob der ursprüngliche Post was aktuelles war, oder ob nur eine Studie aus 2025 wiedergekäut wurde.

Per Suchmaschine findet man einfach so viel Slop nach dem Schema “Die meisten KI Projekte scheitern… beachte daher diese geheimen Tipps um es besser zu machen!” Darüber ist das Meme.

Ursprünglicher Post in !de_edv@feddit.de wurde gelöscht.

Genauen Link finde ich nicht, referenzierte aber sowas wie das hier: https://deutsche-wirtschafts-nachrichten.de/716921/95-prozent-scheitern-warum-kuenstliche-intelligenz-in-unternehmen-zur-falle-wird

though the lobotomized themselves weren’t among the loudest advocates of the procedure afaik

Also works for cocaine, I’m noticing.

Might be best as a comeback, if someone compares AI to a pharmaceutical breakthrough like antibiotics.

Just had a shower conversation with myself, and for some reason the crystal meth metaphor (methaphor?) is really coming together in my head.

“Have you even tried some frontier meth?”

“Sure, you can also get energy with exercising, eating well, and structure. But we don’t have to live like amish people, now that we can have meth!”

Nationalized Open Weight Models -> State-funded AI dispensory

There’s surely a rich bounty of comparisons left to mine.

The bubble will pop. It’s much too big to be sustainable.

But that won’t fix software industry employment because the Large Language Models don’t really need to work that well for this process. They only need to sort of work.

Get ready for the era of digitally sovereign on-premise open weight perpetual software sweatshops.

Funny horse-butt-creature notwithstanding, Dotcorows AI takes have been rather mid. Quoting from Guardian…

In this book, at least, he isn’t animated by the headline-grabbing concerns, whether existential risk or AI psychosis, deepfake porn or election disinformation, because those are unintended consequences. His target is the revenue model and the bubble it has created: “To be an effective AI critic, you need to strike at the source of AI’s power, which is the investment capital it attracts.”

He isn’t falling for AI doom and he is aware of the bubble, which puts him near the better end of the spectrum. But he’s also unwilling to fully criticize community damage resulting from LLM use. That may be because he’s fond of LLMs himself for his text editing and is repping the “it’s just another tool” defense. So he isn’t willing to go all the way when it comes to criticizing the global theft of labour that continues to power this industry. Information wants to be free, dontcha know?

Je, wrong gramnar and the german feels totally off. Much too wooden amyway for a proper death threat.

I think he realized it too and sockpuppeted a better example. Check the comment by “Gerard”

I bumped heads here before on that take, but I can empathize deeply with these people.

I expect that interacting with most of them will be infuriating, since they probably accepted the “this is just how things are done from now on” narrative of AI and are some level of infatuated with the fancy demos.

But this acceptance is also where the inescapable soul-crushing comes from. If you can adopt an internal posture of resistance, the prevalence of AI is still grating but you can adopt a perspective that doesn’t devalue your own skill and makes personal impact conceivable. Many of these folks are pretty far gone, but a pipeline of recovery should be possible from a starting point like this.

The concept seemed interesting to me, but they did seem to enjoy making everything as complicated as possible.

I did find a CLAUDE.md when I was browsing their core repos a while back. That was only the web frontend I believe, not the core algorithm. Though it seems generous to assume they weren’t slopping up that one too.

First time I heard of this guy, but this slaps! Main post material

Das musste ich 2mal lesen, befors geschnallt hat. Hoffentlich wird wieder seriösere Politik gemacht, wenn die Spaßparteien FDP, BSW & CDU außerparlamentarisch bleiben.

Disappointing that this submission was accepted, though no reason to despair.

It is one event in a very solid looking lineup, and in it they are basically pitching a thing. They wanna be the idea guys, not announce a new flagship KDE app.

Die Liste gesperrter Domains fand ich interessant. Einige meiner favorisierten Internetz-Seiten sind drauf 👌.

You’re right of course, stupid engineering like that will kill people and already has.

From an emergency responder perspective I’m mostly asking how can I keep my squad safe and how can I rescue survivors. Once we’re there we usually got all the tools you would ever need. And I’m 100% sure, if someone is in danger I’m breaking out the can opener before I would ever bother to call remote support.

The door handles don’t sound so bad from a firefighter perspective. More excuses to break out the slicy claw. ಠᴗಠ

Having to account for the stupid thing to start driving on its own for no reason seems more irritating. Maybe we can invest in some big jaws attached to the front of the truck to crunch down on and immobilize struggling robo-taxis. This seems like a very reasonable direction to develop car technology.