• Jiral@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    7 days ago

    Is this finally the crack, or will they manage to paper over it and keep the bubble growing even further?

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    167
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    Gen-X, having lived through 1987 (Black Monday), ~2000 Dot-Com Bubble burst , 2008 global financial meltdown, and the 2020 COVID-19 crash:

      • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        70
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        Neither did the vast majority of Gen-X. The cocaine 80’s is peak Boomer shit.

        EDIT: I was born in 73. Started uni in 90. Let’s say you wanted to ride that mid 80’s wave, you should have been in the workforce by 84, that puts you born ~63. By the majority of lists, Gen-X starts on 65.

        • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Yeah. I went to school with rich kids who were suddenly worried about whether daddy could pay for college after that 1987 crash.

          • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 days ago

            Yeah, 1988-1996 was pretty bad. It was my computer hobby that saved my life. No idea where I’d be today had I not turned my side hustle into a career.

            • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              9 days ago

              I guess I was “lucky” in that I was too poor to be directly impacted my the market back then. But I was young, energetic and at my peak looks-wise, so I can’t shit on that era too much.

          • adarza@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            8 days ago

            dad bailed on us for good that winter. left mom and us kids with nothing. he spent several years globe-trotting with his flavor-of-the-month mistress.

            • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              I’m sorry that you had to experience that. I hope you all eventally survived and thrived.

        • 13igtyme@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Many kids had part time jobs in highschool. Plus that still directly impacted kids graduating into a good vs bad economy. Younger Gen x, sure. But it still benefits older and mid Gen x.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Most of us were coming of age in the 80s and working at a grocery store if at all.

    • FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      As a 44-year old who lived through all of those once-in-a-lifetime events (you also forgot 9/11) just once in my life, I’d like a boring decade where nothing happens.

      Between the wars, politics, global terror, economic upheaval and the general state of things… I’m really fucking tired boss.

    • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      9 days ago

      True, but as what happend in the dot com bubble, the middle and lower classes will pay. If you lived in a tech area during the bubble burst then, you’ll know how bad this is going to be worldwide.

      • raldone01@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        So what to do if I suspect a bubble is coming? Sell my investment funds and keep fiat? Buy gold? Buy merchandise to sell later? Buy real estate?

        I have no idea how to prepare.

        • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          If you see risk being very high, make low risk investments: high yield savings accounts, CDs, bonds.

            • Ferrous@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              9 days ago

              On the real, I’ve heard the used CD market is making a massive comeback. There’s something to be said about physical media in the age of internet becoming more and more scary.

          • HurricaneLiz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            Yeah, I’m fully disabled and dependent on my 80 yr old aunt working almost full time to provide housing for me in her home. When she dies I’ll be homeless again. So crying seems appropriate 😭

        • jarmitage@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Unless you’re retiring in the next 5-10 years, it’s probably best to stand pat or shift some % out of large-cap funds to mid-caps. But the old adage usually holds true: “time in the market beats timing the market.” In other words, pulling it all out is way harder to get right than just leaving it in.

          (Your choice- I am not a financial advisor)

        • Goodeye8@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 days ago

          Depends how wealthy you are. If you’re wealthy and even remotely intelligent this is where you make even more money. Wealthy people will diversify, they’ll sell some of their tech stocks and put it into anything not related to AI. Be it oil or manufacturing or agriculture etc. Then they liquidate those stocks (or loan against them, depending on how wealthy we’re talking about) to buy up tech stock when they’ve crashed. You then wait a few years and make money.

          If you’re not wealthy enough to do that put your money into something stable, like bonds. If you want to be sure you won’t lose money (in the sense that the amount of money you put in won’t go below what you put in, it can still lose value due to inflation) your bank probably offers term deposits where you let your bank reserve your money for a few years and in return they guarantee something like a 2% annual return on your deposit.

          And if you’re not wealthy enough to do that… You’re pretty much fucked. Learn to cook and enjoy cheap meals, start budgeting right now, forget enjoyment and hope you don’t get fired.

        • anonymouspl@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 days ago

          Not financial advise but I personally decided to keep my money in MSCI World ex USA ETFand some gold + Stoxx 600. For now it seems my strategy is working. Will see where we go from here

            • then_three_more@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              8 days ago

              Opposite to long term debt.

              Long term is mortgages, loans with fixed terms.

              Short term is credit cards, pay day loans, overdrafts, stuff like klana etc.

              Get those cleared so that the money you earn stays as yours and you’re not paying interest on debt. Once that’s done the money were paying to other people can go into high interest savings so you start earning interest on it, and act as a buffer to stop you going back into debt in the future

        • OhVenus_Baby@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          Gold not silver small portions is ok, bonds because different types are liquid govt backed interest, real estate is always good they don’t make more land, staying liquid is ideal. The most money is made during down turns if you buy right. Don’t time the market it’ll never happen. Instead grow steady of buy whole under valued assets.

      • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        9 days ago

        Ohh absolutely, it was devastating to watch, and then to see corporations being bailed out because they were too big to fail. The big question is, is this really the start of a serious crash where the circle jerk of circular money pumped between 4-5 megacorps comes to an end, or do things really go crashing down from here. You need sanity to stabilize…the nuts have spun off the lugs that were holding the wheels of the economy to the hub…i think one wheel just wobbled a little…

        • pelespirit@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I hope you’re not excited for that to happen is what I’m saying. Even if you’re not American, you will feel this.

          • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            9 days ago

            Ohh absolutely not excited at all. Its a pending shitshow…I didn’t vote for any of this and have already cast my vote to have all these idiots removed from office.

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          There won’t be an AI bailout as with the auto industry and banking. AI hate is bipartisan and no national-level politician is dumb enough to throw public money at them. They’re not a huge employment/manufacturing concern like autos and they’re not the backbone of our financial system.

          (And once again, I love your lug nut analogy, spot on!)

          • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 days ago

            Greetings again 👋

            Yah I agree, I don’t think it will be a traditional bailout like the auto industry though which was forgivable loans, I think it’ll likely come in the form of additional stock purchases by the US government, which is wild when you think about it.

            They’re not a huge employment/manufacturing concern like autos and they’re not the backbone of our financial system.

            No but they (AI companies and those claiming to be one including chip companies) directly influence the stock market, and this administration is having its day manipulating the hell out of it making a ton of money along the way. So if there is a way for the to make money on it, it will absolutely happen. Also the chip companies have national defense interests and so it’ a similar scenario as the DOD’s mission can not ever be hampered lol. The line must go up lol.

            Ha! And thank you.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              One sticking point, Trump can’t spend that kind of money and he’s about to lose the House and possibly the Senate.

          • OwOarchist@pawb.socialBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            AI hate is bipartisan and no national-level politician is dumb enough to throw public money at them.

            Trump loves him some AI bros, though. And could easily “justify” dumping shitloads of public money into them because using AI in the military (bad idea in the first place) makes AI a “national security priority”.

            • shalafi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 days ago

              Trump can’t spend that kind of money. Despite Congress bowing to him, they still hold the power of the purse.

              • OwOarchist@pawb.socialBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                If they actually opt to use it. Which is a big fat fucking if.

                Also, Trump might just steal it from somewhere. (Where has all that Venezuelan oil money gone?) And who’s going to stop him? The Supreme Court has already ruled that he can do basically anything he wants.

      • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        9 days ago

        You would assume so…but who knows. We have a wanna be dictator at the helm in the US that has the mental capacity of goldfish, so fiscal responsibility isn’t exactly this administrations forte!

          • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            9 days ago

            It is quite possible, the giant hiring spree during covid and immediately after was never going to last unfortunately. Maybe after the midterms things will change in a positive direction.

              • BuckFutter@timeyak.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 days ago

                Ahh good point, it is certainly a method that works for them since they really don’t have much else to campaign on.

              • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 days ago

                While that has worked in the past, I don’t think it’s gonna fly this time.

                Optics matter and right now GOP are far more all in on AI, it’s also Cheeto’s halfway point, things crashing badly with Dems having some power won’t look like it’s the Dems in control.

                The fact that the economy took a bad turn right when he came into office is an association that most people won’t forget.

  • Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Everyone here is so excited for the bubble to pop, even though it would make everyone’s life harder.

    As for me? I too am also excited for it to pop.

    Why? Well what the hell is the alternative, I’ll take a market correction and return to sane time any day of the week but it seems that them oligarchs are too horney for their game of financial Russian roulette.

    I rather them putting the gun down, but if they insist on playing then I want them to lose faster.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      8 days ago

      The longer the bubble inflates the worse the pop of going to be. Bursting now is going to be bad, but a hell of a lot better than bursting later.

    • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 days ago

      The problem is the robber barons are unaffected by the crashes. In fact, it just becomes another buying opportunity for them with all that free money lying around. They just keep getting richer. It’s the rest of us that suffer.

      • jabjoe@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 days ago

        Yeah, pretty sure they will get bailed out.

        It will be 2008 all over again and we are still in the 2008 aftermath. Democrats are not brave enough to change things. No one who is going to be allowed near power is talking breaking up the monopolies and regulation. I don’t think things will improve until they have got worse still.

        As a Brit, I just hope we, and Europe in general, kick America dependency to not get pulled round by their whims and eventual collapse. But most people’s digital lives are completely dependent on American monopolies. So much so they don’t dare even see it.

        • myyass@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          8 days ago

          I don’t think so on this one. Logistically it’s toast. Society has a negative outlook on it. You can’t sell AI like you can firearms and politicians aren’t going to stick their neck out for it.

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            8 days ago

            It will all be about maintaining America lead/power (monopolies). Wrapped in a flag. It doesn’t have to be popular. There are only two parties and they will both be for it.

                • myyass@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  7 days ago

                  I’d say it’s by design. There’s a strong push against even something like ranked voting. While that has it’s flaws voting A or B doesn’t work. Especially A or B can’t identify as either nor can be trusted. Prime example is Charlie Christ.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          8 days ago

          They can’t really bail them out like they did in 08. Just to compare Ford to OpenAI for sake of my argument. The collapse of Ford risked not only losing a company but also the institutional knowledge within on top of the fact that Ford itself could eventually pay off the loan which isn’t even getting into other benefits, for comparison what does the collapse of OpenAI risk beyond some edge case nonsense hell could they even pay off a loan. Trying to bail out the AI industry would be dead on arrival by default, the best you may be able to do is downsize them massively and maybe make them profitable via specialized sub industries but yet again that risks them collapsing regardless.

          • jj4211@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 days ago

            More to the point is the magnitude. Note that Ford ultimately didn’t get a bailout, but between GM and financial sector they did about $500 billion, which adjusted for inflation would be about $800 billion. That’s not enough to even cover OpenAI’s obligations by itself, let alone the broader AI industry. GM’s bailout was $50 billion.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 days ago

              Thanks for correcting and adding to my statement on how severe this whole thing is, I have it in my head but I’m a bit shit at elaboration. Also I knew it was one of the big three but I couldn’t remember if it was Ford or GM.

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 days ago

            I’m not saying it is a good idea. Or even one the populous wants. I’d be shocked if it all allowed to collapse and dominoes fall where they may. It will all be wrapped in the flag and about maintaining America lead/power (monopolies) and force fed to voters by both parties. There are only two parties to buy.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              8 days ago

              Oh I got what you meant I just disagree. My point was that AI is a money burning party with nothing to show unlike basically any other industry, even if you bail them out once they’ll likely need to be bailed out again by the next quarter since they don’t really have a product to sell. Not even getting into all the debt a lot of these companies have or any future contracts that have been signed.

              Point is even if they are bailed out it will amount to doing a blood transfusion on someone with an actively bleeding artery. They are far more likely to wipe everything else out than succeed, though I wouldn’t be surprised if that was the end goal for dipshits like Thiel. Maybe it’s a weird but of optism but I can’t quite see enough congresscritters siding with that since basically all of them gain their power through the government and the current economic systems continued existence.

              • jabjoe@feddit.uk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                You say they have nothing, but a lot of people are using it. Now I’d argue many aren’t getting value out of it, even at a 10th to 100th the actual cost, but they think they are. (Often it is someone else has to fix the slop)

                And I’m not saying a government bailout is the end of it. It just kicks the can down the road further. And probably makes the final pop bigger.

                There is a reason these guys are building bunkers. It’s not AI they are fearing. It is us. Rising up and demanded retribution. They are literally trying to work out how they can keep their security people under control in a collapse. And hoping to replace them with bots. Thinking they can maintain that themselves. Or leave earth and hide where we can’t go. It’s all absolutely mental.

        • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 days ago

          2008 had a very wide blast radius. If it was just a handful or even most banks that were in trouble it probably wouldn’t have been a bailout. Mortgage securities were everywhere and no one knew how much they were actually worth. Most the fortune 500 facing a double digit percentage loss was looking likely, which would have been catastrophic.

          Compared to today it might be more money, but it’s isolated to the tech sector. Even then a lot of the worst of it is not on publicly traded companies .

          • jabjoe@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            When the dominoes fall, it is unlikely to be neatly contained due to the scale if nothing else.

        • BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I don’t think things will improve until they have got worse still.

          Shit won’t improve before people kill oligarchs. We’ve not seen a peasant correction in Europe since the French revolution.

  • eatshitforeverbutinaniceway@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    the herd animals who did this are incapable of learning. unless they are taken out of the system, this will recurring. like it has every few years since the turn of the century.

    • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 days ago

      almost accurate. financial regulations put in place after the Great Depression kept relative stability for 50 years. as deregulation accelerted at the end if the 80s, swings resumed and we are niw in the boom/bust cycles that were so painful from 1870 to 1933.

      Also not coincidentally the time of the robber barons

      • eatshitforeverbutinaniceway@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        they and their kin must be made a terrible example of. if the only basis for society is punishment, we must punish them more, and have more society. breed them to punish, I guess, if we can’t do a utopia.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      Yes be cause the other herd that wants to retry communism after it’s failed miserably multiple times is a much better option.

      Crazy idea, but maybe we just tax the wealthy? There’s always going to be idiots in charge of stuff no matter what the system is, but maybe we could just limit the power (and therefore mitigate the damage that can be done) of those with power.

      • eatshitforeverbutinaniceway@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        I’m not saying we have to be communist after. I’m saying we cannot have a stable system until an example is made.

        you ‘anti communists’ and your ‘future for white children’ bullshit really need to be less loud. there aren’t that many of you.

      • potatomuncher@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Taxing the rich is “communism”, dontchaknow?

        Anti-trust laws? Communism!

        Wanting to see LGBT+ live equally and with dignity in their own country?.. pinko af communism!

        Healthcare for all? You better believe it’s communism!

        USA needs to understand the overlords made it a dirty word on purpose. Just like they did with islamic words like “sharia” or “jihad”. Or words from Black culture or ideas that are empowering them such as “woke” or “b.l.m.” or “critical race theory”.

        Even China isn’t really a communist country anymore. It’s authoritarian and hyper capitalist af with “Chinese characteristics”.

        We should take all the good parts of commie ideology without wanting centrally planned 1 party horror show with gulags and re-education camps. Such as nationalized critical infrastructure instead of private power and oil companies making billions while people suffer. Tax the wealthy. Fund public education adequately etc etc.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Most of the stuff you list are actually liberal policies. You know liberals those evil enemies of the tankies?

          Communism is about state control of the economy. Shit that failed every time it was tried.

          The whole point of the communist propaganda is to make you hate liberals that want the same things you do, and to make you spout communist slogans that make you sound like a crazy person. If you just said “I want to tax the rich, bust up big corporations, and implement universal healthcare” most people will agree with that. But If you rant on like “seize the means of production late stage capitalism eat the rich stalin did notihng wrong, china is a utopia blah blah blah” everyone rightly considers you a crazy person and nothing happens.

          Maybe just stick to talking about the policies you want and stop with the commie talk and maybe things might happen. But then you would be saying the same thing as liberals oh noes! That’s bad according to the influencers that are heavily promoted by corporate social media. Always gotta do what corporate social media influencers tell you! Liberal are baaaaaaaad. They just talk about raising taxes on the rich and improving healthcare, they might not have even read Marx! BAD LIBERALS!

          • apiaceae@quokk.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 days ago

            Communism is about state control of the economy

            “Communism” is loosely defined but means communal control of the economy. How that is achieved is debated but it isn’t necessarily through a state. I suggest reading up on leninism (which is what I believe you mean when you say communism) and libertarian communism (which is an example of non-state communism).

            As to “state control of the economy”, it is so oversimplified a worldview as to be useless. The state always exerts some control over the economy because at a minimum it collects taxes. There’s an extremely wide variety of ways the state can interact with the economy, and Western states in fact do a lot of it through monetary policy, tax incentives, subsidies, licenses, tariffs, government contracts, state enterprises, etc. Conversely, leninist states of the 20th century did experiment with various schemes of autonomy of economic agents (often termed “state capitalism”), through stuff like the soviet NEP or yugo “self-management”. Finally, some leftists view states like the USSR or mainland China as having simply recreated capitalism, with the nomenklatura owning the means of production as a ruling class separate from the workers.

            I suggest you read up more on the things you wish to comment on. How can one make a meaningful contribution to a conversation without being willing to listen? Right now it seems as if you haven’t even read the Wikipedia page on “communism”.

          • potatomuncher@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 days ago

            Neoliberalism is pretty fkn bad too though, won’t you agree?

            Those lies they keep telling about free market yet always supporting corporate welfare and socialism-for-wealthy?

    • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Fully agree. At least in the past bubbles, some parts of it trickled to the rest of the economy and we had a societal bonanza.

      During the dotcom bubble you could start a company and make millions out of thin air, you’d pay your engineers ridiculous amounts and everyone could get a job.

      During the housing bubble everyone could get loans and buy a house, live a decent life for a moment. Real economy, not just Wall Street, was soaring.

      AI bubble? Layoffs for everyone. Sense of impending doom all around. Clear signs of financial manipulation directly in front of us. Egomaniac CEOs being obnoxious. Inflation racing. Fucking lame, kill it now, please and let’s start over.

      All of these of course resulted in misery, and it’ll come again. But fuck it, at least the other bubbles were fun.

    • BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      This one has seemed to be a bubble of stupid by stupid. Like 90% of humanity straight up sat this one out because it sounds like a bad idea, but somehow it’ll crash global economies anyway.

      Other bubbles were reasonably hidden, or had some surprise elements, but we’ve all been watching and talking amongst ourselves about this one.

      It’s like watching a degenerate gambler keep going after everyone at the table and even a couple of people walking by have tried to intervene.

      Pathetic indeed.

    • tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Their bailout will be an IPO with an absurd valuation, where pension funds are forced to buy them and we all become their exit liquidity.