

I’m one of the most pro vaccine people you’ll ever meet.
The point of the article is that, when you deny that it’s even possible that even a tiny fraction of children may have had fatal reactions to the vaccine, then you’re rolling out the red carpet for antivaxers to identify a single case of a child that possibly had a reaction, then allowing them to concoct a conspiracy theory that you’re covering up the real risks in exchange for your Big Pharma paycheck.
Being honest about the true quantified risks allows those in positions of authority to compare it to things that are equally, or even more, risky (drink coffee, drive to work, eat a burger, etc), that people do all the time without hesitation because it’s worth the risk.
This allows the public to understand the actual risks in a way that makes sense to them, thus allowing them to make informed decisions rather than just believing whatever crackpot with a book to sell they last heard from on the popular Crackpot of the Day Podcast (byline, “We’re just asking questions!”)




















So, your position is that because some people make poor life decisions, the government should lie to everyone?
Ignore the science and just do what Daddy Trump tells you to do. That sounds like an excellent plan you’ve got there.