Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid - welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

The post Xitter web has spawned so many ā€œesotericā€ right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged ā€œculture criticsā€ who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

(Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. Apologies for not getting the previous one up - my old laptop died)

  • gerikson@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    So there are 2 explanations to why mssrs Altman and Amodei have decided to ā€˜slow down’ ā€œAIā€ development:

    1. it’s too dangerous, any misstep could awaken the evil Robot Satan and kill us all
    2. the rate of progress in new GenAI models has slowed down dramatically, and there’s no obvious way to fix that

    I’ll let you guess which explanation I find most likely.

    • istewart@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      Do the AI doomers/Yuddites REALLY want their signature policy tied to one of the least competent, least popular presidents in history? I would be thinking very hard about this one if I were part of their crew. ā€œYou know who took p(doom) seriously? TRUMP!ā€ is, ah, not a marketing coup, to put it mildly

      • BioMan@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They think this is their last chance to save the entire universe forever and ever amen and will take anything that does not lead to extinction and the conversion of the entire universe into something that does not experience happiness. Keep in mind these are the people who thought that the world could suddenly blow up from a new innovation in a lab in 2015 and had psychotic episodes on that basis.

        • lurker@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          Ā·
          1 month ago

          Trump could personally fly up and prevent a 100 kilometre long asteroid from falling on the Earth and I still wouldn’t give him a Nobel Prize

            • BioMan@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              Ā·
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I hate hate hate that my niche internet morbid fascination from my college laptop in 2009 is now an oval office power struggle.

              Quotes from the president of the united states in the last twelve hours:

              ā€œThe only control or guardrails that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENTā€ ā€œThere is a SICK conspiracy going on against AI and Data Centersā€ ā€œAmericanism, not effective altruismā€ ā€œAI taking of the World, destroying Humanity, and all other things bad, is a HOAX, no different from RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIAā€

              …I guess the Peter Thiel faction won.

              Are we gearing up for a lepoard face moment from the cultist faction of the cultist / oligarch-technofedual-lord / grifter / authoritarian alliance?

              • scruiser@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                Ā·
                1 month ago

                Are we gearing up for a lepoard face moment from the cultist faction of the cultist / oligarch-technofedual-lord / grifter / authoritarian alliance?

                Nah, lesswrongers don’t even have that level of introspection. Plus a lot of them are outright pro-oligarch-technofedual-lord, at least enough so that it outweighs their doomer-cultists allegiance.

                • BioMan@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  Ā·
                  edit-2
                  1 month ago

                  I hate to turn this into a screenshot fest but i mean…

                  They’re calling out effective altruism BY NAME from the white house. The president is still ranting about this. This is NEW.

      • scruiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        It would be hilarious if the AI doomers actually did manage to get Trump to sign some of their ideas into action with executive orders, only for him to reverse course or fail in implementation details, and then a hard tide of anti-Trump sentiment in the next administration to totally undo them.

        Sadly it looks like we will only get the more immediate humor of Trump going hard against them.

        • BioMan@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          1 month ago

          And unfortunately several democratic party luminaries getting the AI doom brainworms in response

    • lurker@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      Coxon (that Anthropic employee) Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon have all joined forces against AI

      All I will say is please god let Anthropic’s bullshit backfire and have them pass Bernie’s bill to completely shut down all AI development it would be so fucking funny

      • BioMan@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        They are going to try to, in rough order of ease and plausiblity:

        • provide a legal excuse for them to stop shoveling money into a furnace of training for exponentially diminishing returns that they can no longer pretend about
        • attain regulatory capture where their weirdos are in charge of everything
        • to thereby make open source AI illegal, only things that go through THEIR gated portals can be used
        • Maybe make ownership of the means of computation for ANY reason illegal so you cannot own anything and have to rent everything from them for any purpose because YOU MIGHT BE SUMMONING THE DEMON IN YOUR GARAGE!!!oneoneoen its only a coincidence that this means you have to rent GPUs for games and rent datacenter space from oligarchs rather than buy them or do what you want on your own hardware
        • BioMan@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          Ā·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Confirmed

          https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/sep/14/google-deepmind-ai-warnings

          The shape of the solution is simple: stop companies from allowing AI to self-improve into an uncontrollable level of intelligence. Treat compute, the main ingredient in AI training, like fissile material. Track it and restrict access to quantities large enough to improve AIs beyond known-safe levels. More specifically, the AI Futures Project’s ā€œPlan Aā€ is a credible starting proposal that limits AI harms while allowing fast AI progress to continue to benefit the world. We have real options for verifying compliance with international compute-restriction treaties, without trusting adversaries like China.

      • BioMan@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        Nobody knows statistics like me. My uncle, great professor, great genes, he knew, frequentist is the worst. Now, Bayes-e-an statistics is the best, the biggest statistics. You gotta have priors! You have a belief, a tremendous belief, beautiful belief in your head. And then you learn, you get the data, and frankly its nasty and unfair.

    • scruiser@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      The lesswrong reactions are hilarious: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/s76hbGpaMkhiNwbTX/matrice-jacobine-s-shortform?commentId=B2WSExeg8wfgDqZiM

      One commenter realizes the truth, but is heavily downvoted:

      For anyone who was at all unclear on the subject: He’s not on your side. He’s against you. He wants you to fail. Stop trying to fix him. AI safety is in the same situation as measles prevention, free trade, military readiness, or the prosecution of the remaining Epstein offenders. Trump & co. are against these things, and they’re not going to be converted just because you tell them again how important these things are.

      Sorry bud, if lesswrongers were capable of grasping this they wouldn’t have fallen for FTX, or kept falling for Anthropic’s half-hearted gestures of placation to doomer-cultists. And of course, many lesswrongers are genuinely very right wing and will thus rationalize justifications for the more centrist lesswrongers to suck up to Trump.

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        Ā·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Another comment:

        My knowledge of politics is nil, but <steelman about what if trump actually wasn’t trump>

        (emp mine)

        • scruiser@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          Ā·
          1 month ago

          Rationalist have never run into a right-wing point or person they were willing to steelman nor a leftist they were unable to screw up steelmanning.

  • nfultz@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    University of California Regent Scott Galloway on the HF incident:

    And I go back, as I do often, to my fraternity days. I was inter-fraternity council president, or as I like to call it, the king of the jarheads. and the neighbors got together and said, we are done with Rush Week and all the noise and said, all noise, music has to be off by midnight. And I met with the head of the UCPD, and I’m like, what do you want me to do? I can’t control these guys. And they said, we have an idea. And they didn’t tell me what it was.

    The next night, they showed up to every fraternity that was playing music after midnight, and they said, who’s the president? And they arrested the president, and that kid had to spend the night in jail. If you hold Sam Altman and Dario Amade and Satya Nadella responsible for what these bots do, guess what? They’re going to figure out a way.

    Or if read the other way, they have already achieved Artificial Fraternity Intelligence.

  • CinnasVerses@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Back when our friends were just forum and Tumblr posters there was the Center for Critical Thinking and the Foundation for Critical Thinking. Who could be against that?

    6 August 2013, SANTA ROSA, Calif. (CN) – In a lurid lawsuit, a former employee claims the Marin County-based Foundation for Critical Thinking is a ā€œcultlikeā€ group whose married bosses tried to make him have sex with the wife, and fired him for refusing. … Hale, a 40-year-old married man and father, claims he quit his job as a high school teacher to accept an offer to work as a ā€œfull-time Fellowā€ for the Foundation for Critical Thinking (FCT) in August 2004. According to the complaint, the Foundation for Critical Thinking, based in Tomales, ā€œtrains educators how to analyze information in an ā€˜objective ā€˜fair-minded’ manner, without allowing their own biases, prejudices and opinions to influence their objective analysis of an issue. It is a ā€˜think tank’ of sorts that promotes a casual work environment. Defendants Elder and Paul frequently hold meetings at both FCT offices and their personal residence, where they sit and lie on the floor amongst pillows. To encourage the free flow of ideas, defendants Elder and Paul often discuss uncomfortable topics, and encourage employees to rid themselves of social, including sexual, taboos. … About three years after he was hired, Hale claims, Elder and Paul began bringing up ā€œinappropriate sexual topicsā€ and asking him ā€œabout his sex life with his wifeā€ during business meetings. … In October 2010, Hale claims, Elder and Paul graduated from discussing sex to encouraging him to have sex with Elder. After calling Hale to a meeting, Paul ā€œexplained to Hale that he was concerned about defendant Elder, his younger wife by approximately 20 years, and wanted to ensure that her sexual urges could be satisfied,ā€ the complaint states. ā€œDefendant Paul proposed that Hale should have sexual intercourse with Paul’s wife, defendant Elder, while defendant Paul observed them. Hale immediately became uncomfortable and anxious, as he listened to defendant Paul, and worried about his ability to keep his job, if he declined. Hale politely declined defendant Paul’s request.ā€

    I wonder how many of our friends deliberately studied other grifts and not just pop psychology books, or if this is just in the water. Their form 990 is here, and shows they lost most of their income in 2019 and are struggling since.

  • swlabr@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I haven’t seen any mention of this in sneer space, so kind of a request for context/comments. I recently learned about Cortical Labs from a news story that came out about a month ago. Basically (and apologies if I’ve got this wrong), the story is that they’ve built a ā€œbiological data centreā€ where the computing units use lab-grown human brain neurones. They’ve been in business (actual business) since 2019. Some shallow searching on reddit and lesswrong shows a flitter of interest from those guys here and there.

    • BioMan@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      Looks like they have ā€˜neuron culture and interface as a service’ going on, for all the good its for.

      Its a real thing. You grow some neurons and stick some electrodes into it, and you can measure the activity of neurons or groups of neurons through some electrodes and induce some to fire through other electrodes. Now, if you have some external process that you define that takes the output from the electrodes and does some computation on it and returns signals to the input electrodes, the way that neurons work and change their synaptic weights over time ensures that the network will learn to produce outputs that make the inputs more predictable. Hence teaching a few thousand neurons to play ā€˜doom’ - you have a program that takes the screen and turns it into a set of input strengths, take some outputs and turn them into controls, and it feeds back, and you eventually have something that learns to do predictable actions.

      Their innovation appears to be having standardized software you can use to define the input and output electrodes with respect to whatever other software you are running connected to the stuff. Who is willing to pay for this is anyone’s guess.

      • YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        Maybe all the AI hype has lowered my standards too much, but that actually sounds pretty neat. No idea if it’s actually useful and the biological component gives me a kind of instinctive discomfort that I can neither justify nor ignore, but it does feel like there’s an actual interesting development there, at least compared to throwing bigger matrices at the natural language problem and waiting for God to pop out at the end.

    • fullsquare@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      from what i understand, it’s also impossible to copy this thing and every single instance will turn out slightly different. also it will continue to learn on whatever data it is fed so you might end up with something useful, that will degrade, is on a timer and has no backups

  • BioMan@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    So, uh, remember that call for stories set in a world where we ā€˜somehow’ don’t get AGI and instead get modern-style LLMs providing such incredible value to the world that it is transformed? That tells people not to use LLMs to write it because its writing is low quality? https://www.gpuworld.org/

    Premise Imagine that AI frontier progress stops as of 1 September 2026: AI becomes faster and cheaper, but it never becomes superhuman or improves considerably across the board. So the Singularity never happens—but GPUs keep getting made. By 2040, there may be the equivalent of 8 billion GPUs globally and everyone has access to a frontier LLM. What happens in this ā€˜business as usual’ future?

    (Incidentally, this reminds me strongly of ā€˜Project Heiroglyph: Stories and Vision for a Better Future’, also by Neal Stephenson, somewhat desperately trying to pretend that there is a bright future ahead of us rather than slow grinding decline)

    Somehow we got… this. I can’t even. I really just can’t even.

    https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/u6hFByFwDLxtnbvje/a-normal-friday-in-2042

    I thought I had lost my ability to be surprised by these people. In here we get:

    • anthropomorphization of current LLMs as conscious beings
    • Graverobbing
    • Trump magically doing everything these people want
    • Married couples paying each other for chores
    • Prediction market language
    • Weird sex stuff
    • istewart@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      Ā·
      1 month ago

      As always with LW, we can adapt the vector definition of ā€œnormalā€, i.e. what is being said is completely orthogonal to reality

    • blakestacey@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      Ā·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ugh. I got to the point with the cutesy redefinition of ā€œCPUā€ and rode the nopetopus out of there.

      Edit to add: Welp, I went back, and it got a whole lot worse.

  • sc_griffith@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    https://www.patreon.com/OdiumSymposium/posts/24-dolphin-of-169474003

    New Odium Symposium episode, ā€œThe Dolphin Fucking Elders of Atlantisā€. We talk about new age crystal healing pioneer Frank Alper and his channeled lectures on Atlantis, Lemuria, Anti-Atlantis, crystals, and the future of humanity.

    If you listen anywhere besides Patreon or Spotify, the episode is delayed. Our hosting service went ā€œLLM basedā€ (?) as I recounted previously and then just stopped working. We’re switching hosts and will have the episode up as soon as possible.

  • nfultz@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Unexpected sneer in the JSI Chart of the week:

    Raising interest rates will only serve to further weaken an economy that is being constrained by high energy costs, and everything that flows off energy, which is just about everything. The Fed could raise its lending rate to 10% and that will do nothing to open the Strait and bring down oil. The facts aren’t wrong in this matter - the diagnosis of the problem is.

    This entire predicament is almost as implausible as a couple of insolvent AI companies threatening to wreck humanity, but then ā€˜volunteering’ to slow down development in order to save humanity, provided that the govt steps in and gives them a bailout, disguised as regulation. I wonder if there are any vintage ā€˜Too big to fail’ t-shirts floating around on ebay.

    Fun times!!

  • Soyweiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    Ā·
    30 days ago

    A critical piece on EA from somebody who actually lives in one of the poorest places in the world.

    Somewhere in 2021, I contacted about a hundred people (mostly individuals) who identify as effective altruists, asking them not for money, but for social media posts …

    … one wrote back saying, ā€œI usually share projects that have been vetted by Givewell or a similar organization….Why do you think your project is more effective compared to all the others?ā€

    All that over a social media post.

    • maol@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      Ā·
      29 days ago

      Ɖmile Torres writing last year:

      […] Nick Beckstead, a noted EA, argued in 2013 that, given the ā€œoverwhelmingā€ moral importance of the far future — ā€œmillions, billions, and trillionsā€ of years from now — we should prioritize saving the lives of people in rich countries over those in poor countries, other things being equal. The reason is that people in rich countries are better positioned to influence the far future.

      And that about sums it up. They don’t care. They simply don’t care. Beckstead explains that it’s better to focus on the rich countries because ā€œrich countries have substantially more innovationā€ and ā€œtheir workers are more economically productiveā€. He apparently presented these ideas in a graduate thesis: I hope he got a bad grade.

  • blakestacey@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    Ā·
    1 month ago

    Unsurprisingly, the Coxon dipshit who is getting all the press for quitting his cushy AI-industry job is a MIRI fanboy:

    I’ve been associating with rationalists for almost a decade. Their ideas were compelling and you can’t deny their foresight. The founders of every superintelligence effort are all bound up in the rationality sphere. Sam Altman and Greg Brockman used to frequent the MIRI offices.

    If MIRI was Sam Altman’s old stomping ground, and the AI industry is so evil he can’t work in it, isn’t this an argument that MIRI was either a failure or bad all along?

    The way I relate to rationalists is it’s like the bizarre hypertrophied physiques on specialized athletes. In my opinion they have weirdly specialized minds that make them uniquely correct about topics removed from daily experience. These ā€œspecialized mindsā€ can also make them off-putting to many people.

    I don’t know if I’d consider myself a rationalist. I am intuitively opposed to polyamory, veganism, and consequentialist intuitions. But I certainly trust them to be correct about factual questions.

    ā€œI’m intuitively opposed to culinary traditions that people have been developing for hundreds of years, but gosh dang it, when they talk about the Machine God torturing a billion simulated copies of me unless I tithe my income to a Harry Potter fanfiction writer, I’m sold!ā€

    Every time this dorkus is in the news, remember, he’s an absolute wanker.

  • Soyweiser@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    Ā·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    No direct links but various people on bsky have discovered LW and EA and are having a collective ā€˜wtf is wrong with these people’ and ā€˜wait all the top AI guys are like this?’ moments. And it is funny to see.

    Sadly the 'you can’t explain this stuff without either looking like an insane conspiracy theorist, or you need to write an actual book because people don’t believe you remains a bit true.

    E: ok one link: https://bsky.app/profile/niedermeyer.online/post/3mvpuq2deo22u (Guess this is a reference to the SE Gyges thread).

      • Soyweiser@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        Ā·
        1 month ago

        Fyi, I blocked him a while back. Didnt like his whole ā€˜im the reasonable centrist’ bit while making blocklists of anti ai people.

        • Architeuthis@awful.systems
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          Ā·
          1 month ago

          Turns out the centrist subscribes to transhumanism (hipster edition)

          the overtone window can’t be that fucked, can it?

          • istewart@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            Ā·
            1 month ago

            Ah, ā€œKurzweilian h+,ā€ there’s his marketing tagline. Too bad importing Kurzweil also brings in all his bullshit extrapolation about exponential curves that all the other weird shit is based on. You’re never going to shout down the hyperbolic lunatics by adopting the core thesis of their hyperbole.

            • blakestacey@awful.systems
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              Ā·
              1 month ago

              Yeah, at best, ā€œKurzweilian h+ā€ will be pseudoscientific guff. I suppose that keeping the lower strata of intellectually bad elements while discarding the worst of the social ones is progress, but, I mean, it’s kind of like saying you’re into your fad diet and LLM-generated supplement regimen and then looking over at RFK and saying ā€œbut that’s totally different!ā€.

              I’ve lost it now, but somewhere in the replies to one of those threads was a person complaining that SneerClub was too much like beating up on nerds in high school. To which I say, first, here’s my blueberry bread recipe, and a nice photo of a winter sunrise, and my Star Trek fanfiction. We all friendly now? Good. Then let me suggest, cordially, that if you are continuing to think of social dynamics in terms of high-school hierarchies and shitty '80s movies well into adulthood, that is a you problem. If I can stop living as the gender I had in high school, you can stop letting your membership in a granfalloon lead you by the nose.

                • Soyweiser@awful.systems
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  Ā·
                  edit-2
                  30 days ago

                  Yeah, as I have mentioned a few times before here I used to read their online H+ magazine a bit, and it was odd, a mix of science and woo, and they published a lot of articles. Until the moment there was one article about how transhumanism must make sure that it also helps the poor, that article was quickly removed (so quickly it wasn’t archived, it was however still in my rss feed which is how I read it). After that article the amount of articles published dropped to nothing. (I always assumed the editor was fired over that or something, I think he himself also added to that article).

                  Ben Goertzel also regularly wrote for H+ mag. A name that shouldn’t be totally unfamiliar to people who know things about transhumanism, and Ben is into PSI now. (Or considering the tone of some of the articles, he prob always was).

                  (Yes, I keep writing this same comment here over and over as I seem to be one of the few people who read the magazine at the time who also posts here)

                  E: looks like H+mag deleted their whole website. (guess being immortal is only for the rich, and not information). But look at this old LW post I found re Goertzel and PSI.

                  And via the comments: The solution of the whole ā€˜is PSI real’ problem? Why did you ask (Robin Hanson) it is betting of course.