• @Tikiporch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    561 year ago

    If horseshoe crabs were to become less economically important, is that a good thing for horseshoe crabs? They ain’t exactly Pandas, so will little Sally and Bobby care if horseshoe crabs become endangered? They’re already in a precarious situation…

    • @miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      411 year ago

      Horseshoe crabs have been existing for almost half a billion years, I would genuinely be sad if we endanger them to critical levels

      • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        271 year ago

        Climate Change is warming the waters they spawn their eggs in. They’re becoming endangered from that. Not because of a few we harvest blood from.

        • @miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          121 year ago

          I didn’t say that harvesting blood is the one thing endangering them, did I. Just that it would be a shame to see them go

          • @Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            81 year ago

            That’s the topic of this thread and even if you didn’t say blood harvesting was endangering them, most people are already going to be thinking that’s what you’re implying.

        • Ann Archy
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          But the blood harvesting helps. Huh. Never thought I’d use the word “blood harvest” today, or ever really.

    • @kandoh@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      I think living to have your fluids harvested in factory farms is a worse outcome than going extinct.

    • Ann Archy
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      If you are any part of nature and also economically important, you get barbarically exploited until you go extinct. If you are not, you will be bulldozed to make room for the former. Capitalism is the best system of morality humans have ever, and will ever, come up with, and I truly cherish the utopia it has brought upon civilization.

      • Capitalism isn’t a system of morality. Or at least it isn’t supposed to be.

        The fact that people think more money = moral is one of the largest problems in the world right now.

        • Ann Archy
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          I chose to express it like that by design. My contention is that capitalism is, in fact, or at the very least de facto, a system of morality. It promotes wealth as an indicator of higher moral stature. It has superseded rule of democracy, as wealth has been assigned itself as a metric by which the efficacy of individual civil participation is measured and the path of society determined.

          In other words, money equals power, and possessing money/power is indicative of a higher moral. Echoes of medieval times…

  • unalivejoy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    171 year ago

    They’re actually being fed the blue milk from Star Wars 8

  • @MooseBoys@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    14
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s a simple, nearly instantaneous test that goes by the name of the LAL, or Limulus amebocyte lysate, test (after the species name of the crab, Limulus polyphemus). The LAL test replaced the rather horrifying prospect of possibly contaminated substances being tested on “large colonies of rabbits.” Pharma companies didn’t like the rabbit process, either, because it was slow and expensive.

    From https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/02/the-blood-harvest/284078/ (emphasis mine).

    • Ann Archy
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      Once it is fast and cheap, expect to see these alien fluid harvesting plants everywhere.

  • Ann Archy
    link
    fedilink
    111 year ago

    This is the kind of shit you see right at the start of alien invasion type sci fi flicks.

    • @remotelove@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Or in China on a Wednesday.

      (I am being a little sarcastic, but traditional Chinese medicine can have some really shitty practices.)

  • @Starkstruck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    21 year ago

    The crabs are released afterwards, it doesn’t kill them. Not saying it’s a perfectly ethical situation, but at least it’s not kill em en masse.

    • @bill_buttlicker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      241 year ago

      This isn’t specifically animal testing, rather it is a process to get life saving medicine. They are working hard to synthesize it luckily. This has been the subject of a few major podcasts but I can’t remember which ones.

    • @abraxas@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      121 year ago

      First off, this isn’t testing. We know exactly what we need Horseshoe Crab blood for, and it’s incredibly important.

      Second, it’s probably not torture. The worst-case-scenario level of discomfort from bleeding them is fairly low, like a human giving blood. And that (incorrectly) presupposes them having as advanced pain-sensing as humans. The actual death rate is the bigger issue, but we are talking about saving lives and the medical community is trying really hard to change the status quo on this. Covered below.

      Third, what you’re seeing in that picture saves thousands of lives per year. How much human suffering, how many human deaths, are you willing to accept to achieve those goals? What if one of those humans that has to suffer or die was your kid? There’s no plant-based alternative to this process at this time.

      Let me clarify this. Using horseshoe crabs for this purpose is VERY EXPENSIVE. It’s only done because we don’t have an alternative yet, and the process is necessary for modern medicine. There is plenty of research going into either making this process less expensive (which probably involves a lower death rate for crabs) or finding an entirely different process to achieve the same goals. But none has been found (well, except that they used to use rabbits for this. I don’t know the details)

      I can understand the desire to spare… um…shellfish some…uh… pain I guess. But NOT at the expense of human life and suffering. That’s just silly.

      • Ignisnex
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        It’s catch and release, not life long milking. Granted, the survival rate isn’t as high as I’d like (70-90% apparently), but I do also appreciate having safe injectable medicines. All things considered, with a species bias, I’d prefer dozens of humans live at the expense of a… Not crab. Unfortunate though it may be. I can’t also help but notice you’ve anthropomorphised them a bit. I’m certain these creatures respond to negative stimulus, but attributing fear and life long trauma seems to be giving their intelligence a bit of an unfounded boost.

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        they catch, “milk” and release them, most of them recover from it. (weaker ones tend to die tho, with survival rate of around 80%)

      • Honestly, of all the messed up shit we do with animals draining blood from a bunch of crabs for medical purposes seems like one of the less egregious ones.

      • voxel
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        around 20% which is acceptable… i think?