• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    25 days ago

    The worst thing is this actually happens, even ( or should I say especially? ) within the science communities. Which is the place where this absolutely shouldn’t be an issue, it should be the science that talks, but it isn’t. 😳

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      25 days ago

      Back in the day, the scientific name for what is now called Down’s Syndrome was ‘mongoloid idiocy.’

      Those who study science aren’t more rational than other people, except perhaps in a narrow area of expertise.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        25 days ago

        That’s kind of the problem, because they are well educated, and have learned the evidence based scientific method.
        So they should be better, the fact that they aren’t, is a HUGE problem.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          25 days ago

          Should. But in my experience, those who are most learned are often the most arrogant and myopic views. They also tend to have the most fragile of egos and don’t do criticism well.

          • gibmiser@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            25 days ago

            You cant be a well rounded individual if you are specialized to hell. At least I imagine that is mostly true.

  • Jaycifer@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    25 days ago

    Look, it’s called a second, it’s just a part of parliamentary procedure, Mr. Daniels is just terrible at phrasing.