• MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I work in B2B IT support, and email is designed to be very async, and for the most part it still is. What I can say with certainty is that business folks expect email to be instant like synchronous platforms are… It’s not, it never will be… It’s gotten about as close as it can be, but it is not, and will never be, instant delivery, no matter how much they want it to be.

  • owenfromcanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Thousands of years after humanity has destroyed itself with nuclear weapons…

    As the sun peeks through the gray clouds and lights up a solar panel…

    A long-forgotten server hums to life…

    And sends an email…

    “Attention Required: Your Order is Delayed”

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It’s because it isn’t a silo?

    Discord, Slack and a bajillion similar apps do not meld with other apps. Email just happened to hit critical mass before “let’s try to get a monopoly” became the slogan of all tech, and collectively Big Tech is too stupid/hostile to replace it with some cooperative protocol.

    iMessage is another pure example of this.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      There are tons of open messaging protocols that have been replaced by closed ones. For instance, Discord shouldn’t be a thing since IRC exists, but Discord exists and is very successful.

      For some reason, likely tied to how it is used, email survived as an open protocol.

      • unhrpetby@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        For instance, Discord shouldn’t be a thing since IRC exists, but Discord exists and is very successful.

        IRC lacks a massive amount of features that discord users typically want. Screensharing, VCs with group and camera support, built-in history (don’t need to use a bouncer like on IRC), built-in online GIF searcher and sender with one click, huge community of bots that use discord’s API to do anything from games to moderation.

        It isn’t even close.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 months ago

          ICQ and AIM managed to draw a huge crowd in the early (ish) days of home Internet.

          It’s not about features…it’s about ease of use.

          Also, IRC wasn’t as decentralized as email to begin with, there were several isolated networks that would not communicate with each other (dalnet, EFnet, undernet, etc)

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s reliable, it’s simple, it’s free, and virtually everyone who uses the internet has one. Email won’t be replaced for a LONG time.

      • cdf12345@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        I assume he meant free like speech, not free like beer.

        There are no gatekeepers to email, anyone can get a domain and their own server.

        • quack@lemmy.zip
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          There are definitely gatekeepers. Even if your hosting provider isn’t blocking port 25 by default, SPF, DKIM and DMARC will see your emails going straight into the recipient’s junk folder/spam filter if not correctly configured. Hosting your own mail server at home is also a fantastic way to piss off your ISP, lose emails to downtime, have your IP blacklisted from many services and open up your environment to exploitation. It can be done but let’s not pretend that it’s easy or that there aren’t barriers to entry.

          Mail servers are like filo pastry. Sure, you could go to the inconvenience and effort of making it yourself and I’m sure it’ll be very satisfying to do so. But 99% of professionals use the store bought version, and for good reason, because it’s a lot of effort for an end result that is no better and in all likelihood probably worse.

          • Illecors@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            Mostly agree, but as someone who has been hosting my own email for years I can tell it is, in fact, better.

            Quick note for hosting one on a residential IP - that would no longer piss any ISP off. You would simply not deliver anything anywhere due to IP being blacklisted by default.

  • Magnus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    I still have a weird email friend who refuses to chat over any apps and I totally can respect that. :)

    • sw1tchm0th@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      cool of you to keep in contact with them :) i have always wanted to do this but i know it would isolate me and inconvenience others just to communicate with me

  • candyman337@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    It’s why SMS still exists too. It’s from an era where everyone just used open standards instead of trying to create their own thing for money. Big tech conglomerates like we have now didn’t exist. The state of the tech industry and it’s proprietary standards is absolutely fucked.

    • vvvvv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      It’s from an era where everyone just used open standards instead of trying to create their own thing for money.

      SMS is literally from a time when every mobile phone manufacturer had their own charger plug. And some tried pushing proprietary headphone jacks.

      Vendors LOVE vendor lock-in.

    • REDACTED@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Google is trying to kill SMS. My new android by default has sms disabled, defaulting to RCS with “try sending sms instead if rcs fails to send” option being off by default, which makes no sense from user perspective

      • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        RCS is actually a huge improvement over SMS, as it is fully encrypted. One of the few times I’ve ever approved of something Google did…

          • Bman915@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 months ago

            It… is? It’s an open standard that anyone can use and implement. The main provider is Google and there has been a huge push from them to get Apple to adopt, which they mostly have. It’s not ‘owned’ by any company. It’s predominantly serviced by Google, but is in fact an open standard. Google and others have their own format which is how they and their apps interpret and interact with each other, but it is an open standard. There are some backend and requirements for it which stops most from setting it up and implementing off the shelf and just going with Google, but you absolutely could use and make your own format with the standard.

  • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Something could replace it easily if they tried to use the open standards and decentralized system like email has. But tech companies have gone too greedy, they won’t make anything that works with other tech companies. Every one of them are trying to pull users to themselves. Now we have people with account in 5 different websites to communicate with different people instead.

    It is sad how far the technology has come. It’d allow so much improvements in quality of life and yet it’ll all being used to extract more money, making life shittier.

  • Robust Mirror@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Reality is everyone has an email, and everyone will keep having an email. My 10 year old has an email so they could sign up to epic and steam. You basically need it to use the internet at all. So of course it will survive.

    Outside of business though, when was the last time you sent an email to someone you know?

    • meliaesc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      My mother uses email for nearly everything. I’m 31 now, but in high school she’d email me from the basement that dinner is ready.

      Just last month I received this… we chat on WhatsApp and phone calls regularly as well.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Mail has the big advantage of being totally cross platform. And it works, basically everywhere.

    • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      All the application protocols were supposed to be cross-platform! It’s something the corporatisation of the net undermined to an extent