@cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 days agoDon’t watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits - Ars Technicaarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1207arrow-down111
arrow-up1196arrow-down1external-linkDon’t watermark your legal PDFs with purple dragons in suits - Ars Technicaarstechnica.com@cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 days agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-square@brsrklf@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglish-1•1 day agoPlease keep your weird stuff private, furries/scalies.
minus-square@stephen01king@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish2•21 hours agoWhile I do agree with the sentiment, I don’t agree that this qualifies as weird.
minus-squareMidnight WolflinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 day agoIf you think that is weird, you must be celibate or something, lol.
minus-square@brsrklf@jlai.lulinkfedilinkEnglish9•edit-21 day agoIf you don’t think it’s weird to draw funny cartoon animals all over official documents, and somewhat attempt to guess people’s marital status out of nowhere when they do, you might be a bit weird.
minus-squareMidnight WolflinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 day agoCelebacy has nothing to do with marital status, lol. You can marry and never fuck. Calling someone weird because of something harmless simply because it isn’t the norm, now that’s weird.
Please keep your weird stuff private, furries/scalies.
While I do agree with the sentiment, I don’t agree that this qualifies as weird.
If you think that is weird, you must be celibate or something, lol.
If you don’t think it’s weird to draw funny cartoon animals all over official documents, and somewhat attempt to guess people’s marital status out of nowhere when they do, you might be a bit weird.
Celebacy has nothing to do with marital status, lol. You can marry and never fuck.
Calling someone weird because of something harmless simply because it isn’t the norm, now that’s weird.
It is weird given the context