• Pili
    link
    fedilink
    -3
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    China deradicalisation bad

    Murican torture good

    • @bender@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Not sure where in posting a link about China’s massive, well-documented genocide did I say anything about my position on Guantanamo, but keep going after those straw men, you’ll beat them one of these days.

        • exscape
          link
          fedilink
          32 years ago

          Why link to a Chinese site? Link to a US .gov site instead if you want to talk about the US position.

        • @bender@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          But anyway, this article is about America’s extrajudicial Muslim torture camps

          Oh, then maybe you should delete this post and give it the correct title.

          • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            -22 years ago

            Too late now. The wheels are in motion. It would be unfair of me to waste all the effort people have already put in.

            • @bender@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              12 years ago

              Then I guess the people will just have to discuss the topic as written, and talk about China’s detention and torture of Muslims. Glad you’re bringing attention to it!

              • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                02 years ago

                But there won’t be anything to discuss about it, except maybe the complete lack of any credible evidence. We could discuss Sasquatch man instead I suppose, since there’s far more evidence for him.

        • @lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          -32 years ago

          Did you read your own source?

          The current conclusion of the State Department lawyers does not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang, but it reflects the difficulties of proving genocide, read the report.

          • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            -12 years ago

            Yes I read that part. They have no evidence but still want to pretend to believe it, like so many others.

          • @freagle@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            -9
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            So the global hegemon with the ability to spy on a single square foot of the earth from space 40 years ago is struggling to prove a conjecture that would harm its geopolitical rival, not because the claim lacks evidence and is politically motivated, but because proving this shit is hard? Is that what you’re saying?