• exscape
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Why link to a Chinese site? Link to a US .gov site instead if you want to talk about the US position.

    • @bender@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      But anyway, this article is about America’s extrajudicial Muslim torture camps

      Oh, then maybe you should delete this post and give it the correct title.

      • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        -22 years ago

        Too late now. The wheels are in motion. It would be unfair of me to waste all the effort people have already put in.

        • @bender@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          12 years ago

          Then I guess the people will just have to discuss the topic as written, and talk about China’s detention and torture of Muslims. Glad you’re bringing attention to it!

          • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            02 years ago

            But there won’t be anything to discuss about it, except maybe the complete lack of any credible evidence. We could discuss Sasquatch man instead I suppose, since there’s far more evidence for him.

    • @lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -32 years ago

      Did you read your own source?

      The current conclusion of the State Department lawyers does not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang, but it reflects the difficulties of proving genocide, read the report.

      • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        -12 years ago

        Yes I read that part. They have no evidence but still want to pretend to believe it, like so many others.

      • @freagle@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        -9
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        So the global hegemon with the ability to spy on a single square foot of the earth from space 40 years ago is struggling to prove a conjecture that would harm its geopolitical rival, not because the claim lacks evidence and is politically motivated, but because proving this shit is hard? Is that what you’re saying?