• ghost_laptop
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      You are fucking doing shit, this is the actual title of the article.

      UN Human Rights Expert Calls for Immediate Close of Guantanamo Detention Facility

    • Pili
      link
      fedilink
      -3
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      China deradicalisation bad

      Murican torture good

      • @bender@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        Not sure where in posting a link about China’s massive, well-documented genocide did I say anything about my position on Guantanamo, but keep going after those straw men, you’ll beat them one of these days.

          • exscape
            link
            fedilink
            32 years ago

            Why link to a Chinese site? Link to a US .gov site instead if you want to talk about the US position.

          • @bender@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            But anyway, this article is about America’s extrajudicial Muslim torture camps

            Oh, then maybe you should delete this post and give it the correct title.

            • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              -22 years ago

              Too late now. The wheels are in motion. It would be unfair of me to waste all the effort people have already put in.

              • @bender@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                Then I guess the people will just have to discuss the topic as written, and talk about China’s detention and torture of Muslims. Glad you’re bringing attention to it!

                • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 years ago

                  But there won’t be anything to discuss about it, except maybe the complete lack of any credible evidence. We could discuss Sasquatch man instead I suppose, since there’s far more evidence for him.

          • @lemmyshmemmy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            -32 years ago

            Did you read your own source?

            The current conclusion of the State Department lawyers does not constitute a judgment that genocide did not occur in Xinjiang, but it reflects the difficulties of proving genocide, read the report.

            • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              -12 years ago

              Yes I read that part. They have no evidence but still want to pretend to believe it, like so many others.

            • @freagle@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              -9
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              So the global hegemon with the ability to spy on a single square foot of the earth from space 40 years ago is struggling to prove a conjecture that would harm its geopolitical rival, not because the claim lacks evidence and is politically motivated, but because proving this shit is hard? Is that what you’re saying?

      • @bender@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        Not here for a debate OP, just here to post the information you promised and didn’t. As a bonus, I gave you a primary source instead of a propaganda rag!

        I’m sure other people here enjoy arguing against someone with the IQ and demeanor of a brick wall, but if I wanted that, I’ve got four right here.

        • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          -12 years ago

          Not here for a debate

          Sir, this is the internet.

          You should understand that your report is not a primary source. It cites one single primary source, the ASPI, a propaganda rag.

          • @bender@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            The official UN news site isn’t a primary source for UN statements on China’s genocide, you got me. I cede all of my points.

            Sir, this is the internet.

            Yeah, and the internet is for porn, not debating deluded people on the internet.

            • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              -22 years ago

              Looks like you’re here for a debate after all! Porn and debate, together at last! The debunk gets everywhere.

              You missed my posting above of a thorough discrediting of that report. Believing what you want to believe despite all the evidence (or the complete lack of) is definitively delusional.