You pay money to drink from the thames??

A simple majority in both to do anything that will have any effect on policy, eg not theater.

A small group of companies are already turning AI into measurable financial returns

Who, other than companies selling AI to other companies?

Progressive sells this as a service, you put their tracker in your car and it adjusts your rate based on driving patterns.

Literally any country can subpoea car manufacturers data. And the data simply would not be collected if regulations required it. This applies to every country.

What’s your deal with China? 98% of your posts seem to be any articles you can find that amount to “china bad”.

Either requires republicans to break rank and suffer the same consequences from the party leadership.

deleted by creator

Removing either is equally as hard, requiring a simple majority.

similar report about China’s BYD you are whatabouted to death

Nobody pretends that BYD cars don’t do that. Plenty of articles get posts here trying to create a false impression that China is uniquely bad in this regard.

You can have data sovereignty by mandating as much, Chinese cars already are built to comply with regulations of their markets.

The only reason both the Trump and Biden admins wouldn’t release the files is if powerful names within both parties are in it.

We expect the republicans to build fascism. We don’t expect the only opposition to fascism at the federal level to maintain and expand those same institutions.

The dems expect us to vote for them, but fund Trump’s gestapo at every opportunity.

Except there are restrictions, which vary by state.

Who said you have to live in West Greenland?

Trusted sources that promoted the same lies that got us into Iraq and Afghanistan.

As far as known globally, you mean known to America and its vassals. Muslim countries have sent delegations to investigate Xinjiang.

But I’m sure the guys who’ve been bombing muslim countries for 50+ years should be trusted to give a shit about the human rights of Muslims.

Did you mean to respond to someone else? I’m vaguely aware of the schools, starlight tours, and Trudou letting oil companies poison first nations water supplies, but I don’t see where Canada comes into opposing support for America.

I literally just came from Xinjiang. Yeah no I’ll trust my own eyes and the Uhigurs I’m still in contact with over some article sourcing people who literally have never been there.

This is some “Portland is a warzone”-level shit.

Regarding your first link, lmao.

I am in China right now, I spent a couple months in Xinjiang and left earlier this week

Literally anyone can go there, there’s no travel restrictions. Theres also a significant Uhigur population in Kazakhstan, whom anybody can talk to.

One of these countries isn’t arresting indigenous people for the crime of being insufficiently white.

“Rule of law” and “fact-based politics” is just code for supporting existing power structures.

Turns out when you write the law, your rule is definitionally rule of law, and when you own the media, you get to determine what the facts are.

Both these concepts were used when the US sterilized mostly black women until… I think they’re still doing it in some prisons, and when Denmark sterilized Inuits as recently as 2018.

Effective at making a bunch of libs throw another minority under the bus, sure.