Well, I stand corrected. It’s probably usually still true. From my own experience, I replied to about 20 odd that every time they texted me again I would donate money to <insert opponent here>, and every single one texted me again with no comment on my threat. I was bluffing of course, but they had no way to know that. I figured that made sense anyway, the process was automated mass texting, why would they bother making a way to read the responses?
You know looking into it now out of curiosity, it sounds like there’s auto dialer laws and they can send SMS without express consent as long as a human initiated the text. So they send messages by hand I guess, then probably have machines handle the STOP stuff
Well, I stand corrected. It’s probably usually still true. From my own experience, I replied to about 20 odd that every time they texted me again I would donate money to <insert opponent here>, and every single one texted me again with no comment on my threat. I was bluffing of course, but they had no way to know that. I figured that made sense anyway, the process was automated mass texting, why would they bother making a way to read the responses?
oh yeah I figured the same.
You know looking into it now out of curiosity, it sounds like there’s auto dialer laws and they can send SMS without express consent as long as a human initiated the text. So they send messages by hand I guess, then probably have machines handle the STOP stuff
https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DA-20-670A1.pdf