• PattyMcB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yep. We have a guy on the team who generates document after document for us to review and it’s all slop that he has no understanding of (not that anyone could understand the mostly nonsense)

        • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          This is also what I don’t get. At worst people start ignoring the documents or requests for review (or code changes) because they have better things to do than review generated text.

          At best you push back.

        • PattyMcB@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I wish. Our company is still at the “you must adopt and use AI” phase. I’m looking forward to the “Holy fuck that’s expensive! Be careful of your usage” phase

          • Monument@piefed.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            My org saw AI as a threat and immediately banned it (blocking websites and restricting features in apps) until our IT folks could evaluate it and implement safeguards. Incidentally, they missed the window when vendors were more or less offering it for free. Now any AI solution doesn’t just have to be vetted against our security and privacy needs, but most likely requires a darn good business case, RFP’s, quotes, and contracts.

            It never became a part of the culture here, much to our benefit.