Maybe because it’s a disingenuous and ignorant defense that plays into the right’s framing that “their transing the kids”, ignores the reality of ‘de-transitioners’, sows doubt on puberty blockers, and is just the casual whitewashed version that is used to make the more controlling legislation palatable.
Like why should you get “close enough” points for this take on Lemmy of all places.
Maybe because it’s a disingenuous and ignorant defense that plays into the right’s framing that “their transing the kids”, ignores the reality of ‘de-transitioners’, sows doubt on puberty blockers, and is just the casual whitewashed version that is used to make the more controlling legislation palatable.
Like why should you get “close enough” points for this take on Lemmy of all places.
Thank you for demonstrating the point in the most predictable way possible.
Thank you for not engaging with a single part of the actual argument.