It was October 30, 2014, and Sweden was the first country to recognise Palestinian statehood as a current European Union member. (Some eastern European countries, including Poland and Hungary, had already done so in connection with Palestine’s declaration of independence in 1988, but the acknowledgements carried less weight since they were made prior to EU admission.)

The Socialist-led government in Stockholm had hoped that the move – which was widely described as both surprising and bold in European media – would put the Israelis and Palestinians on a more equal footing, and thus help revive the hopes of a two-state solution.

But for the Swedish plan to work, the tiny nation of barely 10 million needed other, more powerful, Western countries to follow suit. No one did.

Israel reacted to Sweden’s decision with fury. Tel Aviv immediately recalled its ambassador, and local trade groups threatened with boycotts.

(Former Sweden Foreign Minister Margot Wallstrom says), “If the European Union had committed itself back then, and used the political and economic tools it has at its disposal to stop the settlement expansion and encourage a two-state solution, we might not have been where we are today.”

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Can you imagine that, just 11 years ago Sweden and Hungary used to be cool. Look at them now, both infected by far-right populism.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Sweden really isn’t “infected by far-right populism”. I’m not saying it hasn’t gone more to the right and there aren’t issues but it’s far from what you said. Comparing Hungary to Sweden is like comparing a rabid wolf to a poodle.

      • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Sweden really isn’t “infected by far-right populism”.

        SD is the 2nd most popular party? According to this. And obviously are actually in government

        What the fuck are you smoking and are you sharing

      • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Different rates of infection. And I don’t mean to be pessimistic either, a cure is (still) possible in both cases. Hopefully less dramatic in Sweden’s case, but the “poodle” thing is BS. And it wasn’t me who put both countries in the same article.

        edit: let’s not forget fascist bed fellow “neoliberalism”

        edit2: not a jab at Sweden; I would not exclude my EU home countries from my original statement. One of which shares a border with Sweden btw so I am not exactly clueless here.