It better taste good for that price.

They also serve “domestic sludge” for $1000 lol

  • Catpurrple
    link
    fedilink
    English
    613 days ago

    I think it wouldn’t really taste that interesting, because it’s only meant to be used as a standardized point of comparison for other manufacturers when they’re testing batches of their own products. I recall NileRed did a video making cookies out of a bunch of standard reference ingredients, and I don’t remember if he said at the end they were bland or awful, but he didn’t like them. The reference stuff simply isn’t meant for eating or for use in cooking.

    • Sidyctism II.
      link
      fedilink
      313 days ago

      the nilered video was so precious. here we have a guy thats handling extremly dangerous substances (even radioactive ones) on the regular, yet he totally loses his cool over a cookie cracking in the oven

  • @DomeGuy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    313 days ago

    It’s not for cooking, it’s for tool testing.

    If you want to test how well someone’s fancy cleaning detergent works on stains, or if their claim that a new knife shape makes spreading easier, you want a very standard peanut butter.

    • @mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      13 days ago

      Yeah, you’re paying for consistency, not quantity. The standard reference material will contain exactly what it says on the label. No more, no less. It’s meant to be a reliable and dependable product, with absolutely zero variation between batches. And that consistency costs a lot of extra time and testing to guarantee.