Has Vladimir Putin’s bluff just been called? It certainly looks like it. So long as the Ukrainians were refusing to countenance a ceasefire, then Moscow could portray them as being the obstacle to the kind of quick deal Donald Trump appears eager to conclude. Kyiv had previously floated the idea – after another unhelpful intervention from French President Emmanuel Macron – of a limited ceasefire extending just to long-range drone attacks on each others’ cities and critical infrastructure and operations on the Black Sea. But this was a non-starter that was too transparently a trap for Putin, hoping to make him look like the intransigent party if he turned it down.
after another unhelpful intervention from French President Emmanuel Macron
Mommy mommy! They’re talking about us!
@misk@sopuli.xyz I find your source selection a little curious. You quite often profess antipathy for neoliberals etc., yet you seem to post a lot of explicitly right-wing and neoliberal sources (FT, Politico, Economist, Spectator). Why is that?
It’s a bubble avoidance strategy. They are also much better funded and connected and because of this they are commonly the original source of important news and I think that needs to be credited.
I don’t mind bias that much as long as reporting itself is factual. You can adjust for bias but can’t adjust for falsehood unless you’re an expert at everything. It’s not that I don’t read other sources but there’s plenty of that kind of content here already.
Putin is a real assbutt, that’s all I can say at this time