• @ManixT@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        181 day ago

        This user doesn’t deserve the down votes.

        They’re not saying that Trump should get more votes because of his trash headlines and behavior, they’re just calling out because it’s just what happens with that fascist.

        Democrats should, unfortunately, do the same kind of massive attention seeking to resonate with those of his base that aren’t completely set on just being evil. It makes the candidate look active, engaged, decisive, and not passive on any matter, no matter how small.

        Anyone who pays attention to Trump knows he has no substance with what he says, but because he’s always front and center of every little issue (or at least that’s how he’s got the media optics playing for him), it makes him seem very present and on top of things. Think of it like being a useless office worker, but you always walk around looking angry and in a hurry so people assume you’re busy and working hard.

        Like it or not, there is huge value in that in this whole dumb popularity contest.

        • @danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 day ago

          This is a good summary. I don’t know if people thought I was in support of Trump with my comment. But it is very frustrating seeing so many Trump headlines and no Harris headlines.

          I’m happy to see “Harris bashes Trump for shitty comment” stories. But all I’m seeing is “Trump makes shitty comment”. Like he’s the only candidate.

      • @ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        112 days ago

        Is that the thinking? Like a child in the back of class, desperate for attention and confused about why other people don’t want to just be obnoxiously loud.

        No, folks don’t see any headline and think “that’s how I will vote.” This is the mental ability of an infant who just got object permanence.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            -111 day ago

            As I have said to others, please show evidence that Trump won in 2016 because people heard his name more than Clinton’s a few days before the election.

            • Bakkoda
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 hours ago

              You just made up a straw man. Did someone say Trump won because of this? All they said was any publicity seems to be good publicity for this shit bag.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                -32 hours ago

                I’m not sure what else “the more headlines he gets, the more votes he gets” is supposed to mean other than Trump will win again because of this.

                • Bakkoda
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 hour ago

                  That’s concerning. It means you are so biased against the conversation you can’t see a simple difference of opinion as anything but a total counterpoint to your position.

                  More votes. That’s it. Maybe one more, maybe a few thousand. Not winning, not running away with anything. Just a few more votes.

        • @danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          172 days ago

          You remember 2016? This is exactly how that year went. All these headlines while Trump’s polling numbers are completely unaffected. It’s 2016 all over again.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            21 day ago

            Sorry… you think 2016 happened because people heard Trump’s name more than Clinton’s a few days before the election?

            Please do show some evidence to back that up.

        • I wish you were right. Unfortunately, there are a bunch of idiot voters out there who just fill in the box next to the name they hear more.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            I would like some evidence to support this please. Especially this close to an election.

            I can tell you from personal experience that it sure as fuck didn’t work for Meg Whitman.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                fedilink
                -11 day ago

                I could see it working for two candidates people have never heard of. Beyond that, I doubt it.

                To go back to Meg Whitman, she totally inundated California. Every other radio and TV ad was about her. There were posters every place the campaign could think to stick them whether or not it was legal. By election day, everyone was so sick of her that she did not even come close.

  • @Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1122 days ago

    CBS could just refuse to cover any Trump events due to “ongoing litigation” initiated by the scamdidate and invite NBC and ABC to join.

    • @Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      82 days ago

      If I dare bring a version of a reddit trend here: Trump is a little piss baby.

      Obligatory: Greg Abbot is a little piss baby.

    • Reminds me of the headline regarding Russia fining Google $10,000,000,000,000,000,000 or whatever crazy amount.

      Shitty dictators think alike 💡

    • SeaJOP
      link
      fedilink
      152 days ago

      Seriously. He was not even close to being worth that much before the interview.

    • @adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 days ago

      it must be how much he thinks he’ll “lose” if not able to run his grift and scam from 1600 penn ave for four more years and/or when his social network stock craters when he loses.

      • @ikidd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 days ago

        You’ll be able to tell the exact size of his bribe by how much he makes selling the worthless DJT shares he owns now that the Saudis and Russia have pumped it up.

  • @iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    242 days ago

    The version that aired during the “60 Minutes” program on Oct. 6 did not include what the lawsuit calls a “word salad” response from Harris about the Biden administration’s influence on Israel’s conduct of the war.

    Well, Trump is the leading authority in the field of word salad.

  • 2ugly2live
    link
    fedilink
    182 days ago

    "The complaint, filed in federal court in the Northern District of Texas, alleges the network aired two different responses from Harris responding to a question about the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

    The version that aired during the “60 Minutes” program on Oct. 6 did not include what the lawsuit calls a “word salad” response from Harris about the Biden administration’s influence on Israel’s conduct of the war."

  • @formergijoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    172 days ago

    “The version that aired during the ‘60 Minutes’ program on Oct. 6 did not include what the lawsuit calls a ‘word salad’ response from Harris about the Biden administration’s influence on Israel’s conduct of the war.”

    I’d imagine Kamala’s worst word salad is better than Trump’s most eloquent statement.

  • originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    152 days ago

    of course texas ‘sticks and stones may break my bones but words will always hurt me’ law. crybabies

  • teft
    link
    fedilink
    132 days ago

    The suit demanded a jury trial and about $10 billion in damages

    Taking notes from Pootin, I see.

  • @tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    102 days ago

    Setting aside Trump himself, I really hope that this sort of stuff doesn’t become normalized in political campaigning.