• @pound_heap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    522 hours ago

    Oh come on, the header is a clickbait. There is a US military base in Israel already, it’s been there for years. The article is about an announcement that they are sending another missile defense battery with personnel alongside

    • @DandomRude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 hours ago

      There are 100 more US soldiers deployed, aren’t there? I’m not a US citizen, but I still wonder why more troops are needed to help Israel in an aggressive war of aggression that violates international law.

      • @cybersandwich@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 hours ago

        Lol,maybe because Hezbollah rockets are getting launched and we’d like to shoot them down before US personnel are killed potentially escalating this even further?

        • @finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          7
          edit-2
          59 minutes ago

          I’ve got an idea to prevent this from escelating further: Depose Netan-fucking-Yahu.

          The UN and the US Citizens would praise it if anything. China and Russia would say shit about it but they also say shit about us doing nothing. We can literally only gain from destroying the Israel current administration.

          • @DandomRude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            54 minutes ago

            Absolutely. However, there is no need to destroy anyone. It would be enough for the US to give up its unconditional support for the Netanyahu regime. Then Netanyahu would be voted out and would go to prison for corruption in his own country.

            • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              27 minutes ago

              Ok but that does nothing to stop genocide, land theft, terrorism, invasions, etc.

              It’s a joke to pretend like yahoo is the root problem.

        • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          28 minutes ago

          Who is “we”?

          Maybe I’d have some sympathy for you if y’all stop with the genocide, terrorism, ethnic cleansing, land theft, invasions, etc.

  • @Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    72 hours ago

    In an alternative timeline, Biden finally grows a pair, cancels this and other weapon shipments and the election ends with a landslide.

    It’s right there Joe, it would be a bigger power move than him stepping down.

  • @Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    385 hours ago

    So hold on, no troops in Ukraine, because they’re not NATO, but troops in Israel no problem?

    Or is it because US is scared shitless of Putin? Or is it because a lot of prople sympathise eith Putin?

    Maybe there’s no profit in aiding Ukraine?

        • @Talisker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 hours ago

          Extending Russia, Rand Corporation 2019

          The United States could also become more vocal in its support for NATO membership for Ukraine… While NATO’s requirement for unanimity makes it unlikely that Ukraine could gain membership in the foreseeable future, Washington’s pushing this possibility could boost Ukrainian resolve while leading Russia to redouble its efforts to forestall such a development.

          Expanding U.S. assistance to Ukraine, including lethal military assistance, would likely increase the costs to Russia, in both blood and treasure, of holding the Donbass region. More Russian aid to the separatists and an additional Russian troop presence would likely be required, leading to larger expenditures, equipment losses, and Russian casualties. The latter could become quite controversial at home, as it did when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan.

          https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR3000/RR3063/RAND_RR3063.pdf

        • @nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          352 minutes ago

          Afaik they, as a principle, do not have nukes but retain the capability to manufacture them. Probably a good one since having nukes makes them a target of America and not having nukes also makes them a target of America and others. Every soverign state looks at what president nobel peace prize did to Libya as a reminder of what happens to states that denuclearize.

        • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -121 minutes ago

          Iran is not threatening the USA in any meaningful way.

          On the other hand, USA is constantly invading the middle east, promoting genocide and terrorism, and literally trying to nuke Iran.

    • @Madison420@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      85 hours ago

      We have a top secret base there, just like Korea and Vietnam early troops usually come in and break shit you can’t let go.

      No it’s because Russia is preoccupied and we’re testing near peer weapons from 3+decades ago there with little to no risk to mainland usa. It’s morally wrong sure but it does at least make sense.

      I mean sorta but not really, we’re selling most stuff at a loss. The benefit is really seeing how well our stuff works against the enemy or was designed to fight. Don’t get me wrong people are getting rich but that’s from buying more weapons to replace the ones we sold.

    • Chainweasel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 hours ago

      If Putin didn’t have the nuclear card in his pocket US boots would have been on the ground in Ukraine 2 years ago.

  • @DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    648 hours ago

    US President Joe Biden has said he is “absolutely, positively” urging Israel to stop firing at UN peacekeepers during its conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon, following two incidents in 48 hours. Source

    Some hours later: Biden absolutely, positively sends troops to help Israel out. WTF…

    • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 hours ago

      Wtf is going on in this comments section? They are sending an anti air battery to protect them against rocket fire, but the bulk of the comments are acting like they are sending in troops to go in on the ground into Gaza/Lebanon.

      Does really noone even bother to read the article?

      • @DandomRude@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 hours ago

        I am not a US citizen. My point is not that US troops are being deployed, but that this is a war of aggression that contradicts international law. The US should not support this - not in any way.

        • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -22 hours ago

          I agree that they shouldn’t be supporting it. But we’re talking about defending a country against missile attacks, not violating some potential ceasefire by launching missiles for Israel.

          • @WanderingVentra@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 hour ago

            They’re enabling Israel’s aggression by providing military support, even defensive support. Not to mention adding US troops to the area increases chances some will get killed or injured, providing an excuse to enter the conflict even more.

            • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -156 minutes ago

              I was responding to someone who claimed that by sending tools to stop weapons from killing people, Biden is violating his call for a ceasefire.

              You can disagree with this, but claiming it’s aggressive is just blatantly false.

          • @DandomRude@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 hour ago

            The thing is that Israel was never attacked in a military sense. It was a terrible terrorist attack, that much is true. Israel retaliated - not only against those responsible, but above all against the Palestinian civilian population. The number of victims is simply disproportionate: the attack on October 7, 2013 claimed 1,200 lives; Israel has now killed more than 40,000 Palestinians (this is a conservative estimate). There is no longer any danger for Israel - and in terms of its military superiority, there hasn’t been any for the last 40 years. Lebanon is only marginally involved in all this. Hezbollah is not Hamas. I don’t want to go too far with all the his. It’s simple: what Israel is doing is wrong on any moral scale. Anyone who doesn’t see that is grossly misinformed.

            • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              120 minutes ago

              Zios are in danger as long as the rightful inheritors of the stolen land are alive.

              That’s the whole point of their genocide.

            • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              158 minutes ago

              Noone is defending Israel’s invasion here. Your top level comment implied that Biden is violating his own call to a ceasefire by sending these troops in …when they are a defensive unit. No missile attacks, no need to use the defensive battery.

              • @DandomRude@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                35 minutes ago

                What do you want me to say? With a view to the US election campaign, I’m glad to say: Vote for Harris/Walz! The apparent alternative Trump/Vance would be much worse even in this matter. I have no problem to say that because it’s true. That does not mean that you are fighting a just cause here - on the contrary. It just means that your political system is in shambles and that your moral compass if way off.

                • @EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  137 minutes ago

                  What do you want me to say?

                  What I would love is for people to read the article and then objectively think about it for a second, rather than just knee-jerk respond to the headline in a way that confirms what they already believe to be true, seemingly regardless of what is actually happening.

                  All I did was correct the misinformation you were spreading. There are plenty of valid reason to criticize the Biden admin over, no need to make ones up.

      • @OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        031 minutes ago

        This emboldens the bully Israel. Now they know that no matter who they pick on, they will never feel any real counter-attacks because the US will stop them all. This encourages them to continue their attacks and to pick new fights because there will never be any consequences. If Biden wants to encourage Netanyahu to stop his wars of aggression, he needs to make Israel second guess their attacks.

        This move absolutely counters his message for a ceasefire. This will embolden them to keep fighting.

  • @riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    237 hours ago

    Oh shit. Either he’s trolling Harris’s campaign or they really are a cult. Very popular decision joe, sure people will forget till november.

  • @SSJMarx@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    469 hours ago

    It isn’t bad enough that we’re arming the genocide and the unchecked aggression against Israel’s neighbors? Now we’ve got to fucking participate in it?

    • Anas
      link
      fedilink
      English
      126 hours ago

      You’ve already been participating: The failed aid pier had one use, and it was a military one.

    • DefederateLemmyMl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -94 hours ago

      Now we’ve got to fucking participate in it?

      Ah yes, killing all those innocent civilians hidden in incoming Iranian ballistic missiles…

      • @Gorillazrule@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        74 hours ago

        Right. We will be defending Israel from the incoming Iranian ballistic missiles after they kill innocent civilians on a scale larger than they already have been, prompting a response from Iran large enough that the iron dome is not capable of handing it. Which totally doesn’t make us participants. We’re not directly doing the bloodshed, just enabling it and defending Israel from feeling any consequences.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness
    link
    fedilink
    8510 hours ago

    I hate how I can’t even comfort myself by knowing this idiocy will cost them the election because these fucks are the less horrible option.

    • @TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Yep, this is coming from the most ‘leftist’ candidates we are allowed to vote for. Pretty fucked up options we get to choose from. I hate it here.

  • @Commiunism@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    So, a couple weeks ago Biden was “feeling comfortable” with a ceasefire, but now it seems that he’s comfortable with escalating it by sending american troops. Very cool!

  • @xenomor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    93
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    I feel so bad for the people being deployed and their families. These people are being positioned to be triggers for a war against Iran. They believe it will be easier to manufacture consent for that war if the administration (whichever one we have) can point to dead Americans. Sick shit.

  • Andy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16613 hours ago

    There is a lot about this that is nuts, but one thing that really jumps out at me.

    It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

    But with this I have to ask: are Biden and Harris assisting with a plan that is clearly intended to cost Harris the election?

    I want to say that they surely must’ve told Israel not to launch anything before election day. But based in their actions so far, it doesn’t seem like they’re imposing a “no election interference against us personally” requirement as a condition of their assistance.

    I guess we’ll see.

    • @index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      45 hours ago

      It seems like Netanyahu is planning an October surprise to shank Harris. And it seems like he is doing it in broad daylight. It certainly seems like a massive offensive strike on Iran one or two weeks before the election is a straightforward way to throw a close election to Trump.

      Do you realize that israel government is waging war only because they are backed by USA?

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Israel_in_the_Israel–Hamas_war

      • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        11 minutes ago

        Yes, and zios will be even more backed by Trump (supposedly).

        It’s not even a hidden thing. Yahoo wants Trump. Grift recognize grift.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 hours ago

      If Harris is in on a plan to strike Iran it wouldn’t cost her the election in the US. All they have to do is say, “We received credible intelligence that Iran had decided to sprint for a nuclear warhead. We had to act in a timely manner.”

      What would cost her the election is if an American soldier dies to an Iranian missile and Biden/Harris doesn’t immediately go hard on Iran. Which makes this a ridiculously irresponsible move by Biden.

    • IninewCrow
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3410 hours ago

      The insanity is not that it is Republicans or Democrats

      The insane part is that America is just sleep walking straight into a war that will probably escalate into something much bigger and no one wants to do anything about it.

      God help us all

      • @Zexks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        68 hours ago

        Make me homelander and I’d shut this shit down in a heartbeat. Until such time best I got is a pencil check in a box on paper.

          • @Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 hours ago

            Maybe you can.
            All the money I’d earmarked for kung fu lessons and a collection of random lethal weapons wound up going into pet care and hobbies. Besides, I definitely don’t have plot armor. I’d get popped by some junior security mail cop. They probably wouldn’t even have to shoot me. They’d run me over with their Segway, I’d fall, crack my head open, and they’d put a little skull and crossbones sticker on their scooter, like a WWII fighter pilot.

    • @Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12413 hours ago

      Their messaging so far to Israel has been “do whatever the fuck you want, 💰💰”

      • @riodoro1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        97 hours ago

        She most likely was in the room when Biden authorized the troops you know. She is very much on the same page as Biden on this.

        Sucks you guys don’t have any other option.

      • Andy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5212 hours ago

        This is a weird thing to say, but I actually don’t think that there’s any indication that Harris or Trump would do anything substantially different with regard to Israel, but the biggest change is that if Trump wins, I suspect that coverage of this will disappear behind all the coverage of his domestic chaos. At least if Harris is president I think there is a chance we see the press maintain a modicrum of interest in covering this.

        Either way, words can’t describe my anger that Harris appears to be prepared to throw the election over her support for genocide. It is an unreal situation to watch.

        • @nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 hours ago

          Trump in charge tends to highlight problems not burry them. Like how immigration and the border camps were a huge story, then Biden got elected, kept all the same staff and same facilities and suddenly the border camps weren’t a problem and we went further rightward on immigration. People stop paying attention when Democrats win, that’s how they burry stories, and that’s why the media loves Trump, because hes the one who generates the clicks and engagement they track.

          • @technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 minutes ago

            Zionism is an anti-semitic ideology. It was concocted by atheist colonizers, not religious leaders. The goals are colonial, not religious. Most importantly zios commit these crimes while claiming to be the only true jews. This is extremely anti-semitic.

            So it’s no surprise that they’ve collaborated with literal nazis before WW2. And it’s no surprise that they continue to collaborate with racists and fascists all over the planet. In the usa the vast majority of zionists are christians that are generally very anti-semitic. They want jews to take over palestine so doomsday will come and kill the jews! These are the allies of zionism smh.

          • @index@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -15 hours ago

            No intelligent person should vote for a party supporting a genocide either. Israel government is finishing the job already.

          • @Saleh@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            011 hours ago

            So the one says it out loud, the other just keeps the intention quiet.

            Both are equally sending weapons.

            However with Trump we saw that he pulled American soldiers out of the region and he is much more unstable. So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

            • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1911 hours ago

              So when American soldiers die, he could just decide to fold the whole thing again.

              That would require him to give a shit about the soldiers dying to make a change. His history says the exact opposite of that. Soldiers dying would do absolutely nothing towards whether he changes anything.

              • @Saleh@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -111 hours ago

                Trump pulled most troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan. Sure he doesnt care about the soldiers life, but he isnt committed to being a war hawk. He just does random stuff.

                • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2111 hours ago

                  The troop withdrawal was already being worked before Trump even started campaigning. He just decided to speed it up dramatically so he could say he achieved something, and promised a deadline that was unattainable while doing it well. It’s not random, it’s narcissism at the expense of everything else, including the country.

        • @Zexks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          68 hours ago

          It’ll disappear by him shutting down all news organizations and outlawing any dissenting opinions. He’s straight up said it. There is no functional difference on this issues between them. It’s the ancillary consequences trump will impose on everyone that is why he should be fired into the sun as an example.

      • Cyborganism
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1311 hours ago

        Trump would tell Netanyahu to nuke the place and he’d fucking do it. It would be a catastrophe the likes of which we haven’t seen since WWII.

    • @Doorbook@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 hours ago

      if they money you get from AIPAC is more than the money you get as US presidency and without the headache of being president, I wounder if Kamala care enough to be a president.

    • @brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      412 hours ago

      It feels like they are totally beholden to Israel.

      If they push back hard, they alienate swing voters who like Israel from the old days, aka apocalypse.

      • Andy
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3612 hours ago

        This is actually a persistent myth: there is no evidence that they are beholden to a constituency that would punish them for any actions that curtail Israel.

        Israel’s actions are wildly unpopular across the electorate. They are unpopular with nearly all Democrats as well as most independents and a very large plurally of Republicans. I have seen numerous polls that show that there is a very significant number of voters that Harris is losing over this, and I have seen absolutely nothing to indicate that there is any measurable cost to her speaking out against Israel at all. Which is really sad. Because it means that this is absolutely a moral choice on her part. This is not an electoral choice at all.

        https://truthout.org/articles/poll-endorsing-israel-arms-embargo-would-boost-harriss-support-to-49-percent/

        • @Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I am not religious so I don’t know the details but I have a friend who is very religious and refuses to vote for Trump again. He hates Harris but won’t give me a reason. When I have brought up the Israel stuff he immediately jumps to a very, holy land, must support and defend at any cost mentality. He would never vote Democrat but it makes me wonder how pervasive this weird fairy tale attachment exists throughout the voting base.

      • John Richard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        A majority of Americans are against the action in Gaza. It is a popular opinion not to support it, unless you’re a major donor.

        • @meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          412 hours ago

          So in the last few weeks, Biden can pull support as much as possible basically giving Bibi the finger. Any funding that dries up is unlikely to have more of an effect than pulling support. This helps Harris win. Then she can re-woo them over the next 4 years.

        • @Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          A majority of those who actually turn out to vote are pro Israel (and no, people under 35 don’t vote in other countries where they have more options, so cut the “they don’t vote because of the support for Israel” bullshit, they don’t vote because they’re young and don’t care)

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1111 hours ago

            Okay, well the Harris campaign can continue claiming that the reason she’s down in the polls in Michigan has nothing to do with Gaza.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 hours ago

      Perhaps if he does that, then Joe and Harris will be forced to materially change their tune and take some real action in an attempt to save the elction.