superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square239linkfedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.57Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.orgsuperkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 2 years agomessage-square239linkfedilink
minus-squarenailingjello@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkarrow-up154arrow-down1·2 years agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-squareKiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up41arrow-down1·2 years agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-squarecasmael@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down1·2 years agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-squareinterdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8·2 years agoAmbiguïty increases memetic potential
minus-squaremodus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Ambiguïty increases memetic potential
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)