@m_f@discuss.onlineM to AskUSA@discuss.onlineEnglish • edit-217 days agoWhat do you think of the ruling today that AI art can't be copyrighted?www.reuters.commessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up19arrow-down1external-linkWhat do you think of the ruling today that AI art can't be copyrighted?www.reuters.com@m_f@discuss.onlineM to AskUSA@discuss.onlineEnglish • edit-217 days agomessage-square10fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.world
minus-square🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 linkfedilinkEnglish5•17 days agoMakes sense to me. I can’t just make a collage of randomly pasted copyrighted images and copyright the collage. Why should AI get to do the same thing just because it’s not human?
minus-square@shani66@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish4•17 days agoPretty sure you can copyright the collage, but that’s more transformative and contains not intent than any ai
Makes sense to me. I can’t just make a collage of randomly pasted copyrighted images and copyright the collage. Why should AI get to do the same thing just because it’s not human?
Pretty sure you can copyright the collage, but that’s more transformative and contains not intent than any ai
Good news: Generative AI doesn’t do that, either.