@simple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish • 26 days agoSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comexternal-linkmessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1615arrow-down14 cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up1611arrow-down1external-linkSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.com@simple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish • 26 days agomessage-square126fedilink cross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish4•25 days agoI disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂlinkfedilinkEnglish0•25 days agoDon’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-225 days agoI disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂlinkfedilinkEnglish0•24 days agoAnd that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish1•24 days agoWhy are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂlinkfedilinkEnglish0•edit-224 days agoPersonal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish3•24 days agoBecause you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂlinkfedilinkEnglish0•24 days agoWell, if they own the IP, under the framework under which we live, their will is factually more important. 🤷♀️
minus-square@Genius@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish3•24 days agoNo. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that work is more important when it’s paid.
Don’t get me wrong, fuck Bethesda, but they’re the owners of the IP…whatever they say is more important is more important, paid or not…
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
And that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
Personal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
Well, if they own the IP, under the framework under which we live, their will is factually more important. 🤷♀️
No. Importance is a metaphysical construct, not a legal one.