• NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      022 days ago

      And that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          Personal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?

          • @Genius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            321 days ago

            Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.

            • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
              link
              fedilink
              English
              021 days ago

              Well, if they own the IP, under the framework under which we live, their will is factually more important. 🤷‍♀️

                • @GoodEye8@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  121 days ago

                  Right. So whoever did the update at Bethesda found it important to do that update. The developers of FO:London found it important to release their mod. If you ask the Bethesda employee they’d think their work was more important. If you ask the FO:L team they would say their work was more important. How do you determine whose importance was more important?

                  • @Genius@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    221 days ago

                    I think Fallout London adds more to the game and was wanted by more people. Democracy and utility seem to be agreed on this case, and those are the two measures I use to determine importance.