• Thoralf Will
    link
    fedilink
    English
    452 months ago

    So, how many employees remove JPMorgan from their workday and choose a different employer?

    • Diplomjodler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      622 months ago

      Likely quite a few, which is the point of the entire exercise.

      • Jolly Platypus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        362 months ago

        Yup. This is quiet firing. Companies are trimming payroll in preparation for the Trump economy.

        • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It’s a dumb short term move though. The employees you’re going to lose are your top performers.

          • palordrolap
            link
            fedilink
            122 months ago

            I remember this being panel two in a Dilbert strip (from back in the days when Adams did a great job of presenting as sane.)

          • @frunch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 months ago

            Ehhh H1B is panacea–just you wait and see! 🤡

            We can outsource physical labor, now we can outsource intellectual labor. Fly em in, give them the lowest wage they’ll accept, threaten with deportation if they fall out of line. This is the kind of deal these companies are really looking to exploit – they save money trimming their higher-paid talent while replacing them with someone being paid far less. It’s a win-win for the corps

      • @SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        232 months ago

        And it’s not even guaranteed to work. All corporations seem to be doing (quiet) layoffs so most employees just suck it up and commute, brimming with fresh resentment.

        • @booly@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 months ago

          Any quiet firing will tend to selectively get rid of more good workers than bad workers. The stars with good resumes and reputations in the industry can find good work elsewhere, and on the margins shittier work conditions will cause them to leave. The ones who can’t get another job are the ones that stay, and aren’t going to be as productive.

      • @Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 months ago

        Which is fucking stupid, because you lose the good talent and get left with the ones who can’t find a place that treats them better. But then again, it’s just standard modern day capitalism trying to make the line go up for another quarter, no matter the long term detriment.