Summary

France’s Flamanville 3 nuclear reactor, its most powerful at 1,600 MW, was connected to the grid on December 21 after 17 years of construction plagued by delays and budget overruns.

The European Pressurized Reactor (EPR), designed to boost nuclear energy post-Chernobyl, is 12 years behind schedule and cost €13.2 billion, quadruple initial estimates.

President Macron hailed the launch as a key step for low-carbon energy and energy security.

Nuclear power, which supplies 60% of France’s electricity, is central to Macron’s plan for a “nuclear renaissance.”

  • @GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 days ago

    Good. Germany made a huge mistake for themselves and for all of Europe in shutting down their nuclear plants.

    • @Ross_audio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      242 days ago

      Except they were basically beyond design life.

      And every new plant comes decades late and 4x the original budget.

      • @teslasaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 days ago

        But they planned on replacing it with natural gas. Not to mention that it was supposed to be Russian gas. Sweden pays for the shitty decisions in Berlin.

        • @varyingExpertise@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          6
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Sweden pays for having not enough inner country power lines. Look at the differences within their various market zones.

          Case in point, base load prices for today:

          • @teslasaur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Funny you mention market zones. They are an eu invention and we are forced to match prices because Germany can’t pull they’re own weight in the energy market.

            Not to mention that the eu mandated market zones only applies when you aren’t Germany, because of reasons.

            • @varyingExpertise@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 days ago

              EPEX SPOT SE is a company under European law based in Paris (France) with offices in Amsterdam (the Netherlands), Berlin (Germany), Bern (Switzerland), Brussels (Belgium), London (United Kingdom), and Vienna (Austria).[1] It operates the power spot markets for short-term trading in Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Sweden and Switzerland.

              Not to mention that the eu mandated market zones only applies when you aren’t Germany, because of reasons.

              I don’t see yet how one would arrive at that conclusion regarding EPEX. Please explain.

                • @varyingExpertise@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  22 days ago

                  I’m counting nine countries though that don’t have market zones:

                  And I’m not sure yet how high prices (or rather not high prices at the time of the screenshot) in southern Sweden are linked to Germany not being separated into more than one zone. If Sweden could transport their energy from North to South, the South would be able to use the cheaper energy from there, but apparently that isn’t possible at the moment.

                  • @teslasaur@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 day ago

                    The main issue isn’t transport. Its the fact that we are mandated to sell the excess to EU before we take care of our own.

          • Iceblade
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -11 day ago

            Expanding the transit lines at this point would only lead to German industry purchasing even more Swedish electricity, driving up the prices in the north of Sweden as well and killing the rest of the industrial base. The German effect deficit is larger than the entirety of the dispatchable electricity capacity in Sweden. In some 5-10 years, the northern surplus there will be used up anyway due to the electrification of the Swedish steel industry.

            The ugly truth is that this situation will only be resolved when Germany take responsibility for their own grid, or the transmission lines get cut. The Swedish economy is highly electrified (~70% of energy consumed) and low carbon (~80% of energy consumed), especially when compared to Germany (~35% of energy as electricity, 25% low carbon).

            One of the main differences is heating. Economically vulnerable Swedes are literally being driven out of their homes because of German electricity imports, which are enforced by the EU.

        • @GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 days ago

          Yeah, but the decision was made in 2011 after Fukushima, and before the Russian invasion in 2014. At this time it did make sense, gas was much cheaper and Germany still had an has no long term plan to deal with the nuclear waste.

          • @theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 hours ago

            The entirety of all nuclear fuel waste ever produced and that would be produced after 2000 years of fully nuclear energy produce and consumption at current rates wouldn’t fill a mid sized van.

            The nuclear waste excuse is oil industry propaganda, and you should feel bad for repeating it without getting a paycheck.

          • @teslasaur@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 days ago

            How does it make sense to compare yourself to a natural disaster that would be impossible on German land? Central Europe doesn’t lie on one of the biggest fault lines in the world.

            However, if you start talking about putting nuclear plant on Iceland you might rise a few eyebrows.

            They didn’t stop buying gas until the invasion 2022. Im not even sure that they don’t do it now, just cant admit to it publically. And as a swede, i find it incredibly naive to trust any Russian government ever in the history of ever. There has never existed any trust between russia and Sweden/Finland. Only mutual assurance.

        • zqps
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 days ago

          Fortunately these aren’t the only options.