• @Soup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    518 months ago

    Did…did Vance just call European countries “backwoods”? He couldn’t possibly have, right? He’s not that stupid…right?

          • federal reverseM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -28 months ago

            Anyone who goes to one of these universities has a certain degree of intelligence and access to wealth. You can certainly trade a little bit of one for the other but only within limits. And I would be extremely careful just labelling him dumb because he’s a populist.

    • federal reverseM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Why is that stupid? Europeans are dependent on him now. European leaders will demurely congratulate Trump and him on their victory and hope they won’t be hit too hard by what comes next.

      • @Soup@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        258 months ago

        To call a bunch of countries that rank much higher than the States on quality of life “backwoods” is a pretty wild statement. The U.S. is the proudly unwiped asshole of the developed world.

        • federal reverseM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago
          1. Facts don’t matter to Trump or Vance. Don’t expect anything in that department. They care about getting ahead or looking like they are.

          2. In my reading, Vance didn’t call European countries “backwoods”:

          “I’m not going to go to some backwoods country and tell them how to live their lives, […] But European countries should theoretically share American values, especially about some very basic things like free speech.”

          My paraphrasing of that would be: “There are ‘backwoods’ countries and I expect nothing of them. But European countries must share our values and need to leave our propaganda platform untouched.”

          • Fushuan [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 months ago

            My reading is:

            There are ‘backwoods’ countries and I am not going to be telling them explicitly how to live their lives, they should by default share our values and be doing what we do.

            With this reading he is using backwood countries as european countries. With the American Republican party, you can safely assume the most offensive interpretation of their sentences because history shows us that they usually mean it.

    • @Phen@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      English
      28 months ago

      I think he means “backwood countries can do whatever they want, but EU countries can’t”