• @LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    20
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    Latest Selzer poll, regarded by pollsters as the gold standard, shows Harris +3% over Trump. An earlier assessment gave a scale of what various Trump leads over Harris might mean - if he led her by 11% it would predict a decisive victory for him, with lesser leads meaning not quite as strong a victory, down to a Trump lead of only 3% predicting a strong showing for Harris. Harris leading Trump is literally off that scale and predicts a Harris landslide.

    • @spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      917 days ago

      Are you talking about nationally, the recent Iowa poll, or something else? Because Trump has never won the national popular vote but still made his way into office

      • @jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        617 days ago

        Looks like the Iowa poll, as in of Harris had a real lead on Iowa of all places, there’s no chance for him in swing states.

        However there’s just no way, in anyone’s fever dream, that Iowa would go for Harris, so we have to assume there’s some freak anomaly rather than anytime to count on or predict how things are going.

        • @WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          417 days ago

          If I understand correctly, they haven’t been wrong before, so…. This would be a first if you’re saying it’s inaccurate.