Should Donald Trump fail a second time to be re-elected he faces the very real possibility of jail time and massive financial penalties due to the sheer volume of criminal cases and civil lawsuits that are on hold until after the election.

That is the opinion of Syracuse University law professor Greg Germain who explained in an interview with Newsweek that the former president’s only path to get out from under the federal cases he now faces is to beat Vice President Kamala Harris in less than two weeks and then push the Department of Justice to drop the cases filed against him.

As Germain stated, the multiple federal cases Trump is facing are solid and his only path to victory may be having them shut down.

Newsweek source: https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-legal-cases-georgia-washington-florida-new-york-stormy-daniels-chutkan-cannon-1974406

  • @fine_sandy_bottom
    link
    36 hours ago

    I felt the same for a long time, but as much as I hate to admit it, it does kind of make sense in an abhorrent kind of way.

    The hierarchy in a democracy is supposed to go…

    Voting Public ➡️ Representatives ➡️ Laws ➡️ Courts ➡️ Rulings

    That being the case, a Court shouldn’t really hear cases that might undermine the will of the Voting Public.

    If courts are empowered by the Voting Public, then a Court should not be in a position to make a Ruling the Voting Public does not want, despite that Ruling being correct in the context of the Law.

    Another way of saying the same thing, is that if the Voting Public want’s Trump to have a fair trial they would obviously not elect him as President.

    • @riodoro1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      54 hours ago

      Well, if the voting public has ultimate say than why are there rules on who can become president in the first place?

    • @AAA@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      85 hours ago

      I understand your viewpoint, but disagree.

      By that argument any criminal ever could argue against prosecution because they intend to run for a public office. Ridiculous exaggeration of course, but if Trump gets this chance, everyone else should too.

      • @fine_sandy_bottom
        link
        03 hours ago

        Not really, as you said it’s just not within the realm of possibility for anyone else.

        Trump stands a good chance of being elected in a few weeks. An unfavourable court ruling would undermine that. Do you want to live in a country where courts are more powerful than the will of the people?

        Also, imagine what would happen if he did get locked up now. It would be pandemonium, and not without reason.

        The only way to get rid of Trump is to vote against him, then watch him fade into irrelevance.

        • @AAA@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          It’s not just. He should be locked up for his crimes. If people would want him released, they’d have to vote for a candidate who promises to do that. Just being a promising candidate isn’t a reason not to be prosecuted. There is simply no law for that.

          The justice system is being intimidated by an angry mob into waiting out the situation. This is against everything what the justice system is supposed to do.

          It’s not the will of “the people”, it’s the will of a minority. He HAS been voted out. Courts should indeed be more powerful than that.