@superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 8 months agoThat explains it.feddit.orgimagemessage-square239fedilinkarrow-up11.59Karrow-down123
arrow-up11.57Karrow-down1imageThat explains it.feddit.org@superkret@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 8 months agomessage-square239fedilink
minus-square@nailingjello@lemmy.ziplinkfedilink153•8 months agoGuess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
minus-square@Kiwi_fella@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink40•8 months agoThat’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
minus-square@casmael@lemm.eelinkfedilink19•8 months agoYeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
minus-square@interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.mllinkfedilink8•8 months agoAmbiguïty increases memetic potential
minus-square@modus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•8 months agoYou’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
Guess I’m the only one who read her post and thought the wives were the ones following the young Women.
That’s a perfectly legitimate way to interpret the text, and might even be true.
Yeah it’s a poorly constructed sentence isn’t it
Ambiguïty increases memetic potential
You’re not. But the author of the sentence is not necessarily a contender for Grammarian of the Year.
They mostly are.
Fellow dyslexic ٩( ☉ o⚆)