Elon Musk-controlled satellite internet provider Starlink has told Brazil’s telecom regulator Anatel it will not comply with a court order to block social media platform X in the country until its local accounts are unfrozen.

Anatel confirmed the information to Reuters on Monday after its head Carlos Baigorri told Globo TV it had received a note from Starlink, which has more than 200,000 customers in Brazil, and passed it onto Brazil’s top court.

Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes last week ordered all telecom providers in the country to shut down X, which is also owned by billionaire Musk, for lacking a legal representative in Brazil.

The move also led to the freezing of Starlink’s bank accounts in Brazil. Starlink is a unit of Musk-led rocket company SpaceX. The billionaire responded to the account block by calling Moraes a “dictator.”

  • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
    link
    fedilink
    English
    723 months ago

    The comments here are weird TBH. No, Brazil will not start shooting down satellites. It can just simply outlaw and sanction Starlink, stop anyone from paying Starlink for their internet subscription, and have peeps go around and confiscate ground stations.

    Also, they can just go and ask the US to help enforce their ruling, telling them “do you want to be friends with us or Musky boi?”

    • plz1
      link
      fedilink
      English
      213 months ago

      That’s a really good point. Starlink can ignore this order, but the courts can order banks to stop processing payments to them. Pretty sure Starlink isn’t going to “protest” this at the cost of profits.

      Of rourse Starlink could then go be further shady by taking payments in Bitcoin to get around it. It’s an interesting arms race to follow.

      • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝
        link
        fedilink
        English
        173 months ago

        Brazil is well within its rights to sanction Starlink and prosecute people for evading said sanctions, and have people pay fines and go to prison for buying Starlink with Bitcoin.

        Just like the US does with Iran and Cuba.

          • @Vilian@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            93 months ago

            Because it’s very easy to track bitcoin?, that argument about bitcoin being untraceable is so funny, like it’s literally in bitcoin protocol to log every single transaction, and people need to convert money to bitcoin, easy to track there too

            • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -23 months ago

              So tell me, where does the government link the person to the coin? I do a cash trade to buy Bitcoin, who logs it’s me and puts my name on the wallet for the government to track me down?

              • @YourNetworkIsHaunted@awful.systems
                link
                fedilink
                English
                43 months ago

                The exchange where you traded BTC for USD, which had to comply with AML and KYC laws in order to have access to the US banking system in the first place.

                Like, it’s theoretically possible to work with perfect operational security and never ever link your Bitcoin address to the real world, but doing so basically precludes you from doing anything in the real world with it, including buying crypto in the first place.

              • @Vilian@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                23 months ago

                You need to pay a bank or something to trade your money to bitcoin, the bank only need to log what bitcoin it send to you or your wallet, the thing is, bitcoin isn’t anonymous it was never made to be, something like monero would be better, but you still need to trade your money for the crypto

                • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  13 months ago

                  Anyone can send anyone with a wallet bitcoin. There are services that do anonymous trades, the feeds don’t look great.

                  Thing is, it doesn’t have to be bitcoin to be opaque to the banks, there are dozens of payment services that don’t clearly state the end provider. just doing paypal is enough to hide it from an occasional glance.

          • @Squizzy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            23 months ago

            They need a dish to operate, check for dishes and fine people for breaking trading laws by dealing with a company that has been sanctioned.

            • @linearchaos@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -33 months ago

              Just because the dish exist doesn’t mean it’s still being used. You have to do a blanket ban on having the dish at all. And even then they’re kind of tiny and easy to camouflage. You’d probably have to make the enforcement penalty scary enough to dissuade them. Or pay neighbors to rat each other out

    • @irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      Unfortunately, the US is now fully reliant on SpaceX for access to space now that they decided to rely on corporate spacecraft rather than building our own and Boeing has proven themselves unreliable since that change was made, and now that they finally have a craft they ended up stranding astronauts on the space station until SpaceX can rescue them due to defects. Plus we can’t use Russia like we did after the shuttle program ended but corporate space travel wasn’t there yet. And SpaceX isn’t publicly traded to where it might be possible that enough investors could pressure Musk to cave.

      So I doubt anything will come of it. Brazil will rattle their sabers. Musk will stand his ground, and the US will stay on Musk’s side while pretending as much as possible to be staying out of it.

      • ✺roguetrick✺
        link
        fedilink
        English
        143 months ago

        Haha, that sort of dependency can be just as dangerous for a company as it is for the state. You start fucking around like that and antitrust and defense production act start knocking.

        • ✺roguetrick✺
          link
          fedilink
          English
          83 months ago

          Don’t have to. Defense production act allows them to legally direct the company without owning it.

      • @werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        No 737 has ever leaked helium. So why did the Star liner leak helium? Why couldn’t it just pop an emergency exit hatch mid flight like standard procedure? Why? Why? So many questions!