• @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    -12 years ago

    Not here for a debate

    Sir, this is the internet.

    You should understand that your report is not a primary source. It cites one single primary source, the ASPI, a propaganda rag.

    • @bender@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      The official UN news site isn’t a primary source for UN statements on China’s genocide, you got me. I cede all of my points.

      Sir, this is the internet.

      Yeah, and the internet is for porn, not debating deluded people on the internet.

      • @Blursty@lemmygrad.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        -22 years ago

        Looks like you’re here for a debate after all! Porn and debate, together at last! The debunk gets everywhere.

        You missed my posting above of a thorough discrediting of that report. Believing what you want to believe despite all the evidence (or the complete lack of) is definitively delusional.