JK Rowling has challenged Scotland’s new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.
The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.
She said “freedom of speech and belief” was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.
Earlier, Scotland’s first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a “rising tide of hatred”.
The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of “stirring up hatred” relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.
…
Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X on the day the new legislation came into force.
deleted by creator
Do you see anything about political ideology in that definition?
deleted by creator
Weird how that hasn’t happened in any other country that has hate speech laws.
Is America special? Americans somehow need extra special freedom of speech?
deleted by creator
I thought you just said comedians were getting locked up because of those laws. Now you’re saying they’re rarely enforced. Which is it?
deleted by creator
So, again, you are claiming America is a special place and Americans need special freedoms other Western countries don’t have.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Nope. You don’t have that right. “Offensive” was not in the definition I gave you either. You keep adding to or modifying the definition.
Once again-
That says nothing about offensiveness or about political ideology and there are zero examples of a country twisting that law into some major form of oppression. Not one. Your hypothetical doesn’t change reality.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Specifically which comedians in which countries and what did they say?