Idk, that water is important to save is the argument OP made, I just added context.

deleted by creator

The majority of the plants we grow are fed to animals first which reduces the calories by over 8x. So if anyone wants to reduce their “plant murder” that’s a good place to start.

Not sure why I can’t just eat neither?

Some more context

Even beekeepers think beekeepers are cruel: https://www.honeybeesuite.com/why-clip-the-wings-of-your-queen/

You are ignoring the victim

I knew who posted this before checking

The restaurant at the end of the universe has genetically engineered animals that want to be eaten. I don’t know if that is consent but it’s definitely unethical. Imagine genetically engineering woman to want to sleep with you. Creepy af.

Healthier? Not for the fish.

Killing fish is not necessary like you said. I understand there is negative effects but that’s not really related to my comment nor the article.

Another positive outcome

Animals aren’t inanimate objects to be rented

Not sure the killed bird cares about your land area usage statistics

Someone tied up with a fancy rope is still tied up

Do those centralized Tor people also need 1m per year (which is Sessions donation goal), otherwise they shut the whole thing down?

Oh yea not denying that they need servers. But do they really need to rent them from Google and Amazon instead of hosting their own? Seems like pretty poor use of donations.

Their top 6 earners all get more than half a million per year and all of their infrastructure is hosted on Amazon and Google servers so it’s not really “signal” that’s expensive.

Unless those shops sell flesh, Jesus’s words don’t really apply to that. He called the priests who practiced slaughter for money “violent robbers”