i think so too. killing a puppy is pretty generally reviled here. and rightly so.
artist, buddhist, explorer
i think so too. killing a puppy is pretty generally reviled here. and rightly so.
i think the bs the dnc pulled on bernie may have played a role…
this isn’t shows how futile it is to try to shame such people into being halfway decent. it’s not possible.
and it was more diverse, surprising, and engaging than what the have now.
of course she did. it’s the only way she’s gonna be able to do it. we need to stop focusing on people’s bodies and get on with fixing the climate.
are those mutually exclusive? i didn’t find them to be. as with every single thing, you have to be attentive and responsive to the actual kids and situation. those change as time goes on…
i expect them to trust their kids and not try to micromanage the entire country because the don’t.
the oligarchs who run the country don’t want those things…
what is the first line? i may not know.
politicians just want power. they don’t believe in much besides that.
i wouldn’t be so sure about that…
sounds high to me too, but i don’t rwallly know.
i’m curious. what other motives do you see as possibilities?
i read this same exact bunch paragraphs earlier. why is it here again?
who was? not kim davis.
the definition of terroism is using violence or the threat of violence to get your way politically.
people don’t like thugs. thugs are dangerous and bad for society. so social creatures like humans naturally cheer them getting creamed. baby animals that are pets? hint: one thing isn’t a different thing. context. it’s what gives meaning.