Historically, the relationship between the US and Israel is far closer than others in the region. Everyone else are much more like fair weather friends. Intelligence between the two is highly integrated to a degree unseen outside of the closest US allies.

https://archive.is/T3l2a

Man, Woody Harrelson really let himself go, huh

Doesn’t do what archive.today does, unfortunately. This article wouldn’t be available in wayback.

Not good, for sure. Sucks that there’s no working alternative. It’s trivial to not participate in the DDoS at least. uBO blocks it by default.

That doesn’t mention any Russian narrative. They altered a page as part of their personal grudge with that blogger. The same blog targeted in the DDoS attack.

https://youtu.be/T6dmMUR9TVI

The entire administration is made up of ridiculously insecure men flexing to themselves in the mirror.

“The United States is decimating the radical Iranian regime’s military in a way the world has never seen before,”

he said, masturbating furiously.

Can someone please make this creep take a cold shower before doing these briefings?

Yeah, we definitely need a replacement for archive.today. If anything, though, you’d think it not being spammed by wikipedians would improve performance.

I think in this case the NYT might have changed something specifically to make it fail. It’s working for other sites and it’s failing in a really strange way. It starts archiving, gets part way through, then it fails and kicks it back to the archive queue. It just loops like that for maybe 15 minutes before giving that weird ‘doesn’t exist (yet?)’ error.

Okay archive.today is just dead set on being completely useless today. The main link is a gift link now.

Your mom’s an undisclosed bot.

I posted this before archive today was finished, just removing “/wip” from the url but archive today failed. It’s been dogshit for the past few days for some reason. Generating a new link now and I’ll update it when it’s done. Thanks for letting me know it was broken.

My bad. Sometimes I forget that the Mayor of News has decreed there shall only be ONE HEADLINE and that any attempt at knowledge outside of the official bumper sticker is strictly forbidden.

It’s not primarily to do with Israel, which is what headlines are about. A headline about Israel invading would be misleading. You’d expect an article about Israel invading and not one about the Lebanese government’s efforts to disentangle itself from Hezbollah.

Why are you even arguing this? You didn’t read the article. You incorrectly assumed it was about something it isn’t. Like, those amateur NYT editors just haven’t stumbled upon the brilliant headline writing method of making shit up without reading anything? What are you talking about.

The article is about the internal politics of Lebanon.

1. This isn’t an article about Israel invading a country.

2. “Israel” appears in the article 27 times (once in the post body, even!), including this sentence that also includes “invaded”:

Israeli forces have also invaded and seized parts of southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah militants have engaged them in clashes over the past two days.

Right?

‘If you agree to everything we want and nothing you want… that’s the kind of deal we can get behind!’

Unless the goal is to help Peter Thiel demolish the remainder of the free press, paying those men millions in libel lawsuit money would be more stupid than brave.

https://archive.is/SV9HY

Thanks!