TheDeadGuy

In the last 7 years they’ve been pretty one sided on the political propaganda spectrum

The statement from the wildlife management seems to imply the women were being idiots, but the news article sounds like they were attacked randomly

The tribes series, or z-axis games, where you are able to move up and down as well as the traditional x-y movement you see in virtually all games. Usually set as shooters, they are fast paced movement games that have a huge skill curve which is why they aren’t made that often. Super fun when you get the hang of it though

Example
https://youtu.be/xOK3n8j7czA

I don’t really agree with how crypto is used/abused but I do appreciate the idea behind it

It’s nice to see support

You might think they look cool but they don’t work that well when it’s actually cold or raining hard

Well, China is spending money to expand itself. You’re right about Nato though, they just want the US to do it all for them and then be the scapegoats too

Timmy, so help me god if you are doing math in there again!

It’s harder to make apps for kbin right now, but that will change in hopefully a month or so

Kbin is newer and the dev, Ernest, is getting more help from the community now that its growth has exploded

https://kbin.social/m/kbinMeta/t/127572/Ernest-Appreciation-Post

Well in French, carabin is a rifled horseman

Are you saying that minorities should not be protected?

How about, agree/disagree and informative/troll

It’s a definitely an area to watch but I’m a huge believer that transparency makes a community better regardless of size. If you being brigaded or abused it’s visible to everyone and you can block those accounts if you wanted

The ultimate hope is that social media evolves for the better

1. The first problem is people tend to follow the hive mind. If it’s downvoted, they will also downvote and vice versa. They also will believe a comment with lots of upvotes and won’t fact check.

2. The second problem is people will abuse a karma system. Bots can increase the reputation of an account to make them seem more trustworthy

3. The third problem is that the current system let’s you see who is downvoting/upvoting. People take it personally when they are disagreed with and will retaliate since they can see those users and stalk their account

I don’t think these problems warrants a change in the current system. The transparency is a crucial feature. Seeing the number of downvotes serves as a great red flag to warn readers that a comment might not be true even if it has a larger number of upvotes.

This does take away the anonymous part of your social media voting experience, but the ability to manipulate the platform is greatly decreased. People that get riled up about disagreement will need to chill and you will need to block those individuals that can’t.

I think this will allow the development of a more mature community by taking away some of the anonymity

Money grab via IPO. During covid Reddit saw all the crap companies going public and making bank and tried to get in too, but the bubble popped before they could close a deal. Now they are trying again while things are on the upturn and investors are more willing

I wouldn’t touch this IPO when it does happen, major rug-pull vibes

People are really bent out of shape with others disagreeing with them. You aren’t being silenced, you’re being polled and that’s not a problem.

Now if you are harassed because of it, that’s a different subject than a simple downvoted. That’s why I love the transparency here

Do no evil

What a joke

You could eat a posterior

People tend to upvote and believe anything that already has a lot of upvotes. Seeing downvotes is a good red flag to warn users to not blindly believe everything they see with positive karma.

I think the current system is harder to manipulate than reddit