H…how? For anyone who is in private insurance sure but most people get insurance via work and you cant opt out unless you have equivalent or better insurance elsewhere and its likely more expensive if you have the ability to go elsewhere because workplaces are able to negotiate lower costs due to size.

Im all for boycotting, been doing so myself for american goods for example, but truly how the hell do you think this is a meaningful solution?

Very convenient, for you, to ignore that there’s more than a single solution to the issue.

If you build the infrastructure, make it safe, reliable, and more importantly useful, people will come.

Distance also becomes much easier to deal with when you build usable neighbourhoods with working transit solutions mixed use neighbourhoods reduce car use because the cornerstone, now created and only a block or two away from you, sells your food, the train/tram/subway is just a bit further, that takes you elsewhere in your town or city.

This isn’t rocket science, the reason Canada is so car dependant is that we cater our business to large stores with larger parking lits to satisfy car based businesses rather than anything else.

You don’t need density to create viable transit infrastructure, you need a will to move beyond cars as the default and only perspective. You don’t need a universal, one size fits all solution (this is what cars are touted as), you need a solution that suits the environment that its created within.

Try biking in a couple miles in -20C and black ice on the road

Its easy to conveniently ignore that other countries in Europe have developed cycling infrastructure to combat the negatives of biking in the winter.

Its just called prioritising bike infrastructure on par with cars, i.e. clearing snow and bike paths that aren’t reliant on car infrastructure in the first place.