Why not just stick with Proton VPN or Mullvad? There’s nothing wrong with them.
- 0 Posts
- 23 Comments
I agree, it has uses but they’re pretty niche. When I talked about how it’s unnecessary for people, I meant normal people who don’t have such niche needs or objective.
It is a brilliant tool only if it’s used correctly.
That sounds very dystopian to me. Have we humans reached such a low that we need to be reminded of the person’s name we are talking to even though we’ve met them before or business relationships, or what we talked with them?
The glasses I wear everyday which do not contain any kind of electronics already does its job perfectly. Smart Glasses are an unnecessary extra, created merely due to the rise of trend of ‘en-smartify every product and implement it with unnecessary electronics and spyware.’
I would’ve blocked this person immediately. I would hate anyone uploading my picture on the internet without my consent and also manipulating the image.
North@lemmy.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Russia targets Signal and WhatsApp accounts in cyber campaign | AIVD
3·8 months agoThey are trying to push their new government made chat app called MAX on everyone.
MAX for max surveillance.
North@lemmy.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•ProtonMail provides information used to identify email owner...
322·8 months agoSome people in the comment section are really dumb switching to other alternatives thinking that Proton isn’t trustworthy because they gave the information despite the organisation not using anonymous currency. What’s ironic is that some of these people are switching to those alternatives where you can’t even use anonymous currency.
Also, kind of a clickbait title.
the website I am visiting doesnt work on firefox.
One more disgusting tactic of those corporations! You can access these websites on Firefox by using an add-on Chrome Mask which would make websites think you’re using Chrome, not Firefox.
You’re right but Chromium still belongs to Google and they can change it whenever the want, and do anything to it. For example, if Google, say, removes a feature from Chromium or a line of code in it, this change will not be limited to just Chrome but also other Chromium browsers like Brave, Vivaldi, etc. including FOSS ones like Cromite. And the second reason to avoid Chromium is so as to not let them become a monopoly in this as well. If they control this market too, that’s a win for them.
My thoughts on Vivaldi:
It’s a decent browser however I’d recommend avoiding Chromium wherever if possible. But the biggest downside of Vivaldi for me is that it’s not fully open-source. I would almost always prefer open-source software rather than closed-source even if the parent company or developer is trusted. I would not recommend Vivaldi because of this reason.
My thoughts on Qwant:
Again, the same thing here, it is trusted but it’s still not open-source so it’s a no from me.
What I’d suggest:
• Firefox-based browsers:
All of these suggestions will contain ONLY free and open source softwares.
I would suggest you to use one of these or other Firefox forks instead of chromium browsers but, ultimately, it’s upto you what you choose.
All of these Firefox forks remove the telemetry that you’ll find in the original Firefox browser.
-
IronFox: Privacy-wise, it’s pretty strong. The only counterpoint I’ve noticed is that the sites may break sometimes because of its aggressive anti-fingerprinting and stuff. This is available for Android.
-
Fennec: This is the one I use and I’ve found it pretty nice. I’ve been using it for about 4-5 months now. This is available for Android.
-
LibreWolf: This is what I think is the best for desktop. It is very good for privacy. This is available for Windows, Linux, and MacOS.
-
Zen Browser: This browser has a nice balance between privacy and convenience. Pretty customizable, plus I like the UI of it. This is available for Windows, Linux, and MacOS.
Note: I haven’t tried these but they’re reputed and famous in similar private-focused communities.
-
Mullvad Browser: The privacy is strong but it is not very customizable. This is available for Windows, Linux, and Mac OS.
-
Waterfox: This is a famous and reputed browser too. This is available for Android, Windows, Linux, and MacOS.
• Search Engine:
All these suggestions are also FOSS and can be self-hosted.
- SearXNG. It’s the most popular right now and it’s completely FOSS.
Note: I haven’t tried the following these, as well, but they’re also pretty famous and respected in privacy-related spaces.
I’ve presented my suggestions but you should choice the one that suits you the best while also providing you with sufficient privacy and always avoid closed-source softwares even if the parent company or developer is trusted.
-
I second this. Always try to avoid Chromium if possible.
Where’s the evidence for this though?
Not disagreeing with you, just curious.
Truecaller always seemed very fishy to me anyways. I live in a country where most people use Truecaller— even businesses. This makes it difficult for me to quit Truecaller altogether, and it pisses me off.
I have evidence that truecaller has sold my contact to call centers.
How did you get that evidence?
North@lemmy.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Proton has ties to Israel. What's a safe alternative?
2·9 months agoYou can at least try to minimize the information that they squeeze out of you. It’s either that you can give least amount of information such as just device you use, or whether you use Google or not, etc. or you could let them know every single detail in your life, everything you do, everywhere you go, even everything you think. That’s what this community is about. It’s not about being an alien to the world but minimizing the invasion of our privacy as much as is possible.
And many people do actually boycott everything, they quit all electronic devices and live the old school way, away from highly urbanized or metropolitan areas. If that’s what you want, be a hermit like them.
North@lemmy.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Under British and UK Legislation anyone using or developing end-to-end encryption is now a “hostile actor”
10·9 months agoThis is such a stupid law. A lot of things require encryption, even the government itself need end-to-end encryption. Are they going to ban Signal and Briar next?
These laws are made by people who have the slightest knowledge about the subjects they’re making the laws on. Oppressing the people is their only concern, everything is else anti-nationalist activity.
This is the first biggest step towards a totalitarian society: cut all (end-to-end encrypted and private) communications across citizens. I hope the people there realise this and protest against this law or something. U.K. is literally becoming Oceania.
North@lemmy.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Under British and UK Legislation anyone using or developing end-to-end encryption is now a “hostile actor”
331·9 months agoThat’s what the governments in 1984 could do as well.
North@lemmy.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.world•Places to do a private chat among friends? (Web)English
1·10 months agoUse Signal. It’s pretty secure and private and the best thing about it is that it’s also FOSS!
North@lemmy.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•[Discussion] Using Instagram privately ? with(out) account, Follow account, Dicover interests, similar accounts
1·10 months agoWhat you want would not be possible for Instagram. The best thing to do would be to not use Instagram but if that’s not an option, the most that you can do is use Nora (FOSS) for Instagram and other social media.
Exactly. People who aren’t as tech savvy would think something’s wrong because they think companies won’t lie to them/they’d think they have no other way and they would have to opt back in.
There isn’t any explanation about what the user can do on that banner. It’s just “accept it or we’ll annoy you and make it very inconvenient to use the service.” And most people would hit ‘accept’.
Privacy keeps worsening day by day now. 2026 feels just as privacy-centered as 1984 nowadays.
Or NixOS if you want both Debian’s stability and Arch’s rolling releases.