This is not El Niño anymore. More like El Carbon.

https://hacdias.com/2026/03/11/filebrowser/

The definition of dictators is very much flexible and politically charged. We decide someone is a “piece of shit” and after that, we call them dictators. By instance, when the Taliban where CIA assets, they where not called dictators, but freedom fighters and where glorified in Rambo III.

Only the frontend is open source. A model similar to telegram.

Had to nuke the profile on my instance. The modlog tells the crocodile is toning down their true opinions to appear less egregious.

OP shared a thought. I pointed this is a formal concept and pointed the name, so they can search for more. The concept describes a real and observable phenomena.

Why are you bringing moral judgement of people here? Even if poor people are guilt of their own poverty (they aren’t) like you are implying, it doesn’t change they are formally, but not really free. Marx description stills holds up.

Austrália

A nation built on stolen land where the better predictor of your class is is you are descendants from the settlers or from tha natives.

Nothing is stopping…

Except the inequal distribution of aducational and work opportunities, that assure the intergenerational inequality reproduction.

a concerned note:

Your comment about some people having fought for rights and others not is borderline racist. With precious comments about Darwin, it’s a red flag.

All people fight. Some fights are smashed with unimaginable violence. We are watching a live genocide in Gaza to prove this point. Oceania colonization is built upon a genocide. I’m not assuming you have conscience of how disturbing these comments are for a person like me, in South America, where all attempts to built a decent society where meet with USA interventions. Try to think in more broad terms, not only based on your experience, but trying to encompass the multiple experiences in the world.

Yeah. Marx called it formal vs. real freedom. All the people are free to sleep under the bridges or at a five star penthouse. But some are forced to sleep under the bridge and only a few have means to exercise the freedom to enter the penthouse.

Thanks. This is a great work for non-English fediverse enthusiasts.

The last one is Lord of the Lost. Scratched the itch of getting a metal band that I don’t have to worry about being a nazi cult in the future.

Do you have the link of the source? Thanks.

I would never drink a milk that lasts two weeks. Real food spoils. This must be some liquid plastic.

One liter (0.26 gl) bottles or boxes.

And to hide the collapsing demand that fuelled their bad quarter numbers (higher stockpile and time to get paid for sales).

This crow I can support.

What is relevant: “for its own commercial purposes. In that regard, the general terms and conditions of use of that marketplace give Russmedia considerable freedom to exploit the information published on that marketplace.”

This turns the marketplace in a business that must have responsibilities and duty to care because they not only host the content, but process it.

Hosting is defined on paragraph 6. It does not involve processing of information. You user hit publish, it is published without any processing and and you don’t claim right to “use published content, distribute it, transmit it, reproduce it, modify it, translate it, transfer it to partners and remove it at any time, without the need for any ‘valid’ reason for so doing.”.

The GDPR don’t claim you are responsible for merely hosting personal information, but you become responsible by processing it. “The processing of personal data should be designed to serve mankind.”

The point is: you can run a lemmy instance, have people publishing shitposts all day in a hands off moderation policy. One day someone posts a doxxing. As soon you are told, you delete and it’s OK. But you can’t run a business where you invite people to post doxxing information, you claim rights to distribute this information, and them say you are only hosting it, and not processing it.

The problem is the site want the cake (free harbour immunity) and eat it (gain rights to profit from the published content).

Not really. The decision only states that a service that allows to publish advertisements with personal information must review these and make sure it’s they have the consent. Something all “gone wild” subreddits do with volunteers. A company that runs advertisements should be able to.

A company that publishes ads for sexual services without getting confirmation of consent is a risk for the society and this business model should not be allowed.

And extra large magazines. You can find glock magazines with 50 or 100 bullets.

But as today was a machine they listened, because nowadays we trust AI more than people.

Maybe you want to crosspost to !artshare@lemmy.world