

There are languages that compile into JS or WebAssembly, might be worth to look at that. I like Clojurescript, but others are also good.
Creator of LULs (a script which helps links to point to your instance)
Come say hi here or over at https://twitch.tv/AzzuriteTV :) I like getting to know more people :)
Play games with me: https://steamcommunity.com/id/azzu


There are languages that compile into JS or WebAssembly, might be worth to look at that. I like Clojurescript, but others are also good.


If you desire to interpret my comment as “shitting on people”, that is your prerogative. However, that is not how I meant it.
Thinking about things is great, and that opinion is actually contained in my comment, if you look closely: I want people to think, just not about things that aren’t really worth it.
The article is great, thinking about this in general is great, you just don’t want your future to be spent making decisions about where to place semicolons, that is not a beneficial use of one’s time. Without that thinking about where to place semicolons, you’re free to think about more useful topics.


To expand on this: Ideally you would work in a language you didn’t have these inane rules about semicolons, like the article is obviously good and correct, but it’s just not something that anyone should have to think about, it doesn’t lead to better programs.


… no
Degenerates want to get feet pics of people they know in some way, so as long as OP isn’t famous or already has some kind of following, that’s not going to work.
Random feet pics are something you can get at any point in time and don’t need to pay for.
It entirely depends on what you want the user experience to be like, and what ecosystem you choose.
So, no idea, give exact specifications.


Tl;dr: just put a semicolon at the end, and you never need to think, this is just not really worth it


Buuut… Why would you transport wind+solar 300 miles? A couple of miles, under 100 or so, sure, but why more than that?


Sometimes I wish we hadn’t get rid of evolutionary pressure in the way that we did. In ancient times, they would’ve died from this and hopefully not reproduced. Unfortunately, so many things that are stupid now carry almost no risk or at least much much less.
I’m glad of course it is like this, because it means that people who shouldn’t have died also benefit from improved medicine etc, so I don’t really want those times to return. But still, sometimes…
Same for me, just because I kinda need my food to have different colors
I would tell him, that if my behavior towards pixels on a screen is a factor in the admission to heaven, then his methodology is quite obviously flawed and I’m not sure if admission is even something to be desired.
I understand, however even nonoptimal plastic boxes are better than a bag.


which would just about kill mj love for programming
How is the expectation of coding fast killing your love for programming, but stopping programming altogether and letting an AI do it is not?


It’s interesting that so many people are able to do this. For me, I’d just rather lose my job than do something I fundamentally disagree with. If I didn’t, I would just be so extremely unhappy that I couldn’t function anyway.
Not bashing you, just pondering the differences.


This, but instead of your rant against the US, just humans in general. Every country has those kinds of people that would be/enable evil. The only difference is that that in different places their evilness is allowed in different amounts/representation.
The problem here is that he obviously didn’t get her new Tupperware after.


@OP, den Link kann man auch im Post editieren.
You can not imagine that for some people it could be new that the exact same color looks completely different?
Wikipedia says the original dress was blue/black.
The left and right dress are exactly the same color. However, your eye makes you think the left is black/blue while the right is white/yellow. (Within the shaded area)
The inane thing is being able to skip semicolons. Exactly, why should anyone bother with that. We wouldn’t have this conversation. So yes, this is valid criticism of JavaScript, it’s not a very important one at all, but still.