The problem is that they see people hating the torment nexus and then they assume it must be because they didn’t market it correctly.
Like "oh I guess they don’t like it because they can’t share it, let’s add a suffering multiplexer so they can enjoy it with friends and family*
*⠀for⠀a⠀small**⠀fee
**⠀might⠀not⠀be⠀small
It looks like a really good trolling shitpost, or like the schizo ramblings of the kind of people who actually ship themselves with celebrities or send threats to authors once their “head-canons” get demolished.
I’m so glad I never gave any serious amount of money to Sony, Microsoft or Nintendo.
Or the Steam Deck/all the handhelds that support Linux/SteamOS
It’s yet another distro being shilled by god knows who on YouTube and other social media.
The fact that it’s being pushed so hard without anything of note about it is already suspicious to me.
Right wing newspapers love to do this shit where I live. We get into a crisis, people start skipping meals because they don’t have money, and they will talk about the health benefits of dieting and fasting 🙄
Well, one is a GPU like this one that only has 2D support and it’s apparently perpetually stuck as experimental. The second one is a trackpad / numpad combo that someone else got working but because the code never got upstreamed it broke. The last one is an internal microphone that might have support in the kernel but it might be missing quirk flags or a small change in how it works.
The quote about how all evil needs to win is for good people to do nothing also explains perfectly well why the 1% keeps winning despite being an extremely small minority that is just as vulnerable to violence as anybody else.
I admire people like this because even though there’s like 3 pieces of hardware I wish I could fix like this, I’ve got no clue where to start. And except for one, most are simpler devices than the M1 GPU.
Did they include AI slop, dogshit mobile game ports, low effort games, and the like in the dataset? If so, I’m not surprised.
The more I think about it the less I see them as victims, and more as irresponsible with important data.
It’s hard to feel sorry for these non profits even if it the data loss is a tragedy. It’s been years of people screaming that this kind of shit could happen. That not accepting the pain of early adoption of open source software would lead to the extreme pain of being locked out arbitrarily.
In my experience even one of the platforms with moronic developers eventually fixed their Firefox support. I dunno if the surge in Linux users had anything to do with it or not, or if it was because I would browser there, make my payments fail then switch to the Falkon browser every single time.
The actually funny part is that they can’t. Most of the bloatware is not available on Linux because it doesn’t support it.
SteamOS is not meant to be used on normal desktop/laptops. You’re making things harder for yourself.
Having deleted my account recently I’m not so sure anymore. Before I left, a lot of comments lacked coherence, and many were in the wrong language. I think the bots are finally outnumbering the real users for specific communities.
It’s actually a bit infuriating after a decade of tech savvy people screaming that any data given to these corporations was eventually going to be used for something they wouldn’t like. This isn’t some unforseen consequence.
I think it’s a “country/region capital” thing. The more central a city is to the management of an area, the more insufferable the people it produces are.
In the Chinese Room scenario, cards with Chinese written on them are inserted into a box.
Inside there is a man who doesn’t understand Chinese but has a lookup list of which symbols to write as a response to every possible sentence you can write on the inserted card.
For anyone observing from outside the box it looks as if whatever is in the box is fluent in Chinese and can hold a conversation. But the man inside does not understand anything about Chinese.
This is used as an analogy to explain that machines, very much like the man in the box, do not actually understand the data they are fed, nor the data they output, no matter how human the response might seem.
It was an argument against the Turing test, which is about whether machines showing behaviour indistinguishable from a human is a sign that they can think.
The Chinese Room argument is that they must also show understanding of the data itself, rather than just human-like responses, to say that they think.