• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 11 days ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2025

help-circle
  • So focused on hate

    Cope better. There was no hate.

    The lower price would mean lower quality traditionally yes

    No no no, it’s not lower quality, it’s just not luxury. It’s better than the $5 Hershey bars available to you in the US. This is not a law of economics, it’s a capitalist assumption. Lower prices can mean lower quality in for-profit contexts because companies cut costs to maximize profit. But in a nonprofit, state-run model, the goal is different: providing a high-quality public good at an accessible price. This is a de-commodification of a necessity or cultural staple. Chocolate in Mexico has deep indigenous and historical roots.

    Then creating regulation as a governance is expected the lowest prices. Did they circumvent regulations, taxes, etc.

    I don’t know, did they?

    The insinuation here is that the government is cheating the system. But if the government is the one setting or adapting the regulations, this is not circumvention, it’s governance. State-run enterprises often don’t need to chase profit margins because their revenue model isn’t extractive.

    HENCE, how could a capitalist compete

    Correct, that’s the point. The state provides a baseline to protect people from price-gouging and artificial scarcity. Capitalists can compete, but they must add value, not by suppressing wages or cutting quality, but by genuine innovation or diversification.

    This is similar to how public healthcare in many countries sets a baseline: if private healthcare wants to exist, it must offer more, not extract more.

    Over extension of power leads to suppression of the workers, field owners, and consumers. With capitalism winning.

    This is incoherent nonsense. Capitalism “winning” through the suppression of workers is not a bug; it’s a feature. State efforts to offer goods affordably often arise precisely to counteract capitalist suppression.

    The idea that public chocolate production suppresses workers more than Nestlé or Hershey’s, companies with notorious labor violations, is laughable.

    You have so little experience with the pain of the world that you can only dream your comforts.

    That’s just a rhetorical grenade, you’re not engaging with what I said, you’re trying to discredit me personally. And honestly, it’s frustrating. You’re implying that lived suffering and collective solutions can’t go hand in hand, but that’s just not true. Some of the fiercest, most committed advocates for public goods come from deep struggle, especially across the Global South.





  • However ideology like this leads to issues in reality.

    Issues for who? The consumer? Or the capitalists?

    If a competitor gets lower prices would hint at some questionability.

    It would hint that it’s a shitty product, presuming no foul play by the government and the product is not overpriced (doesn’t appear to be).

    Government correction becomes suppression. Suppression leads to . . .?

    Government correction how? From suppression I think you mean lowering their price? The scenario you’re laying out doesn’t make sense.

    The point of this kind of product is to be the baseline, no capitalist should be able to afford to offer the same product for less, because the government already has the lowest possible margin.

    You start by making a better product, and you can charge whatever people decide the improved product is worth. It’s a good thing that an asshole capitalist can’t market a $7 bar of chocolate when a very good quality one is $1. At that price difference, your chocolate better be amazing.




  • You guess very stupidly, and without evidence. No one suggested “anything goes”, and you’re once again implying an action that occurred in an attempt to stop genocide is isolated act of aggression.

    It doesn’t “go”, Houthis don’t just get to sink ships, that’s not the argument being made.

    Israel is actively slaughtering children, and they’ve been warned for well over a year now to stop or ships heading their way will be attacked.

    I know you understand the concept, you’ll happily attribute the death of civilians indiscriminately bombed in a besieged enclave to the resistance militants and disgustingly call them human shields… But here they aren’t living in an open air prison that they aren’t allowed to leave, here they took a job on a ship going to a state that’s currently unapologetically live streaming a genocide.











  • Oh no not AI videos! The horror. Bring back the 2,000lbs bombs on tent encampments and leaving babies to starve to death in hospitals, bring back white phosphorus on civilians, bring back normalizing dead baby pieces hanging from the rubble. But not AI videos!!!

    Biden is our Hitler, and our history books will reflect that. You’re correct, the Gaza genocide is just one small chapter in the history of England and then the US colonizing Palestine.

    Be consistent, if you’re able to credit him for the good things he did instead of saying he’s just building on what Trump left him, you should be able to recognize that he could have ended this genocide but refused.

    Even if Trump was a good president/person and wanted to end it, there’s nothing left of Gaza for the remaining population. Biden already wiped it out.


  • First they came for the Palestinians in Gaza And I did not speak out Because I was not a Palestinian in Gaza

    Is that clear enough yet? I’ve watched Americans dismiss the slaughter of our children as a papercut and describe the infinitely preferable (compared to your children being literally shredded to pieced daily, or a paper cut in your words) future of Americans who refused to vote for a viable candidate as being stabbed with a rusty sword.

    And you expect us to be there for you when you’re the last one left? Fuck you. You described an active Genocide as a paper cut, and the self-destruction of the American empire and the upcoming recession due partly because they got rid of cheap exploitative labor as a stab with a rusty sword. You lack historic perspective, empathy, morals, and certainly class consciousness.

    The Democrats are not your friends, do you forget that Debbie W Schultz rejected our demand for Bernie and have us Hillary? That’s how we got Trump the first time, and what did the Democrats do? They blamed us, the voters. You forget Hillary’s contempt for Bernie voters and how she described him as an infiltrator?

    America ruining itself is going to save millions of lives and give many counties the chance to recover from exploitation. You’re just being a selfish fuck who’s upset now that consequences are home.