• ohulancutash@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    They usually pick an archive site that serves malware. Nowt wrong with the BBC link though.

      • fullsquare@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        3 days ago

        maybe you can’t

        The Eagle’s Nest was still on fire early on Saturday By Patrick Jackson

        Published 3 hours ago

        Police in the southern German state of Bavaria have detained a suspect during a fire at Adolf Hitler’s Alpine mountain retreat, the Kehlsteinhaus, also known as the Eagle’s Nest.

        Dispatchers in Traunstein received a fire alarm from the building at 21:15 local time (19:15 GMT) on Friday and firefighters found it engulfed in flames.

        Difficult terrain was hindering efforts to extinguish the blaze and it was still burning early on Saturday, police said, with some 200 emergency personnel deployed. There were no reports of injuries.

        The Nazi dictator used the retreat, which lies above the town of Berchtesgaden, as a part-time seat of government and met commanders there to plan the invasion of the USSR in 1941.

        Hitler also used the area as a backdrop for propaganda films portraying him as a lover of animals and nature.

        A criminal investigation is under way to determine whether the suspect is connected to the fire.

        The Eagle’s Nest (file photo)

        Completed by the Nazis in 1938, the Eagle’s Nest escaped destruction after their defeat in 1945.

        Since then, it has become a popular tourist destination and houses a mountain inn.

        It serves as “a cautionary reminder of the abysses of the inhumane Nazi dictatorship”, according to its official website, external.

        During World War Two, Hitler and his followers were responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of people, including the mass murder of European Jews.

          • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            2 days ago

            Two hundred people deployed to save an historical building that had an exhibition about the crimes committed there. Every opportunity to remember all the faces of evil is important. I don’t understand why people celebrate history going up in flames.

            • grue@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              As long as you’re careful to distinguish actual historical monuments (e.g. this) from propagandistic fake ones built long after-the-fact (e.g. Confederate statues built in the 1950s).

              • ViatorOmnium@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 days ago

                Of course. But I would still see value of preserving those in the right context - for example, a Rewriting History Museum instead of a public square.

            • decolo@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 days ago

              I don’t explicitly think it should be burned down, but I do know of specific examples of modern day Nazis who still venerate it and just don’t have the equipment to process that it’s intended to be cautionary and not a shrine to hitler.

              Fascists watch Starship Troopers and come away impressed by the cool soldiers shooting bugs. those people are not going to be shamed by a scoldy exhibition with pictures of concentration camp dead. They want more of that!

          • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            2 days ago

            There’s such a thing as ‘Erinnerungskultur’ in Germany, in which it’s considered important to remember the history so we don’t repeat it.

            Otherwise this place has been basically a restaurant for years that doesn’t really capitalize on the historical aspect iirc.

            • decolo@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Real talk, you don’t casually pop out for dinner to hitlers remote mountain bunker that has been converted to a restaurant. That is a very specific, politically filtered clientele.

              • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                I also wanna say that I -as a communist- would’ve also gone there because of the historical associations, because I’m fascinated by history and enjoy the idea of “[person] was here [x] years ago”, like when I visited the place John Lennon got shot.

                • decolo@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  I hear what you’re saying, but I don’t care how good the food or view is at mar-a-lago after the American dictator dies, I don’t think I’d enjoy patronizing it.

                  I wouldn’t have had this perspective 5 years ago, but the world is not trying to conceal its evils any more.

      • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        oh really? I wish they’d do that in Britain too. Instead they’re talking about forcing everyone to pay for the BBC if they watch Netflix or Youtube.