• BenLeMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Speak for yourself. I’m OK.

      That’s the problem with this notion, isn’t it? That idea that humans are no good and that we shouldn’t exist. In the extreme you get movements like antinatalism that have given up all hope for humanity and take on a downright anti-human stance. I happen to think that’s an unhealthy way of seeing things.

      • Signtist@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        I love humanity for what it can be, but at the moment it’s absolutely a problem for the world as a whole. You can love something and still understand that it’s currently a problem, and needs to improve in order to be healthy.

        • HoopyFrood@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          The issue is semantic, but also important: our present actions are deeply problematic to the planet; however, are not imbued with the inherent trait of being problems to this planet.

          To say “we are the problem” implies that the solution is for us to go away. To say “we are being problematic” would imply that the solution is to change our actions.

      • Feraldud@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        Tree killing off the tiny flower for competition because of it immediate pain in proximity in a vast fertile land, forgetting that the vast land is diminished by the pretty lawn.

        Ending with no land even for the big strong tree.