I’m getting Chinese ram then fuck it.
That sounds like it would chafe terribly…
Make sure to use silicone based lubricant; that, at least, doesn’t require any rare earth metals.
Guy selling memory says buy memory now it’s only going to get more expensive?
“Please keep piling on the hype fomo train we have every single one of our eggs in this one basket”
Fucking cartel bastards.
😑
So… How those Chinese ram sticks are going ? Good, nice, now i gonna ditch another segment of western market for affordable asian tech…
Is the western market going to allow that or are they going to ban it because “security reasons”.
Luckly i don’t live in a ditatorship like u.s., i just gonna get myself two sticks once Aliexpress start to sell it
Didn’t they literally steal a lithography machine? Nothing is ever a security threat to some of you till you wake up with your roof gone and bank being empty.
My bank accounts empty and zero of that was paid to china, all us companies taking all my money, fuck em.
What do you mean they’re taking your money? Sue then? Or do you mean “I pay for services”?
EDIT: Stupidity aside, I do have to stress that yes, you will be poorer as for many governments, alot of income comes from chip manufacturing and related industries. After China stole the secrets and machine, they will now take your social funds.
Stop blaming china for the failures of OUR GOVERNMENT. “china” didn’t make us attack iran for no reason, “china” didn’t let US tech plagiarize literally everything. “China” didn’t run our national debt to over $40T. “China” didn’t elect a leader of a global child sex trafficking ring. That’s all shit that WE DID TO OURSELVES.
The fuck you talking about? The technology and machine was stolen from Europe, not US. Not everything is about US. The biggest pain will be felt by Taiwan.
EDIT: the original comment which started this discussion said “western market” not “us market”. I’m from Europe myself.
“China” didn’t cause any of Europe’s problems either
This of course assumes the bubble doesn’t pop, and is presumably driven by memory purchase contracts with AI companies consuming all supply at peak pricing with 5-year terms. If OpenAI or Anthropic run out of investor money tomorrow, those contracts will be worthless and supply will recover (even if HBM capacity can’t be instantly reconfigured to consumer).
While I don’t expect it tomorrow, OpenAI has signaled a future of constant price increases with their new $500 monthly tier replacing their $200 tier, and it’s likely we’re in the start of the death spiral as subsidized supply ends, demand plummets in response, and unprofitable companies start folding. But the AI market market has remained irrational for much longer than it should have.
(Just a reminder to roll back your overclocks while we huddle for warmth during tech winter.)
My youtube algorithm is filled with AI doom/truthsayers and it feels like everybody else is taking crazy pills. Ed Zitron is a bit theatric but there’s nothing factually wrong with his arguments. Eli the Computer guy explains it in plain language that would be easily refutable should a refutation exist. I’m not shorting anything but I’m certainly not going out of my way to add any funds with significant exposure to AI companies.
The hidden variable is how much money can the us treasury print to keep the ai bubble going. Nobody knows that, could be one trillion more and the system collapsed, could be maybe the debt needs to double to $80T before collapse.
At this point, with trump and the tech billionaires in charge, they’re just going to keep printing money until they can’t.
CEO says his products are worth more and will continue to increase in value.
Shocking.
Micron CEO said they expected industry supply to improve gradually in 2028, but couldn’t predict when supply would catch up with demand.
Why would they want balanced supply and demand? Scarcity affords them a higher margin for the same output. With so few competitors there currently seems to be little reason for them to try and meet demand.
That’s not how supply and demand works. When a market is out of economic equilibrium like this, with demand sharply rising, that is literally what drives competitors to arise and to try to increase supply to match. This is fertile ground for exactly that outcome to happen.
If you ever want to leave behind the economic fairy tales we tell children and college freshmen:
Have to dig into the nuance of this specific scenario.
A new memory vendor would be a huge capital expense, and investors are generally a bit apprehensive about that.
Further, it would be years before they could theoretically roll out product, a delay that investors would need to be awfully patient for under the best of circumstances. Further, we went through this dance in recent history, people thinking that the chip industry needed huge advancement and expansion of supply, only for demand to subside to normal before any of that expansion could even start.
And the stated payoff? Lower margin product than competition. Not exactly exciting to tell your investors your whole game plan is to make less money than your competition.
Then there’s the reality that this is not an innate direct demand of memory for the sake of memory, it is intrinsically linked to these big AI companies, leading to the big question: Is this a bubble that has a risk of popping? If so, then the market will go poof before you have a single item shipped.
Even if broadly, you think the AI is viable, if any one company, especially OpenAI, gets left behind, the memory market could collapse. If not for Sam Altman’s very specific purchasing commitments, the memory pressure would probably be much more modest.
Ok, fine, you are a ride or die believer in the durability of the AI boom and that every company is going to win. However, even if the AI companies do very well, what’s to say they will still have the same appetite for hardware by the time this new enterprise gets going? A pivot from aggressive training to exploiting more what they have done, or some breakthrough that dramatically takes down their bloated memory requirements. If you believe in the AI boom, then just directly investing in the AI companies is the safer bet.
At the end of the day, an investor has a choice between being confident in the AI boom and investing directly in the AI companies, or being a bit less confident and investing in the memory vendors that are making bank now with a weaker, but still viable post-pop story. If you aren’t comfortable directly investing in the AI companies now, then you almost certainly aren’t comfortable with a long shot that only benefits if the AI boom keeps going exactly the way it has been going.
Yes, effort is underway to do this in China, but it’s more about supply chain sovereignty than free market interests. It may have similar benefits, but here the free market is unlikely to be the impetus for increased supply in this scenario.
cough cough barriers to entry cough cough
What ever in the name of Supply Side Jesus are you talking about? The FREE MARKET surrounds us always, its INVISIBLE HAND guides all economic transactions to their most EFFICIENT outcomes without the need of any human intervention!
Blocked for heresy!
