• FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          CEOs exist to siphon surplus value to shareholders instead of letting the people who produce it retain it. It’s more that the CEO role is unnecessary in worker owned businesses than incompatible.

          • TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            CEOs exist to execute the decisions of the board. In a capitalist system the decisions can often be boiled down to “siphon surplus value to shareholders instead of letting the people who produce it to retain it.”

            In a socialist system where the workers have a controlling majority of the board, you still need someone to execute the decisions of the board. Or are you suggesting that a worker owned company doesn’t need any top leader beyond the board?

            • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Why should it? If the workers themselves are on the board, then they know what the board decides. No need for a middleman CEO.

              • TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Are you imagining that every single worker are on the board at every single company? Even the ones with hundreds or thousands of workers? It’s all direct democracy, and no representative democracy?

                • FlyingCircus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  I mean, we have the technology to make direct democracy work, but even with representative democracy, there’s no need for a single leader. There are many examples of functioning anarchic organizations. I’m not really imagining one ideal way to organize enterprises, there are many ways to do it. Hell, you could even do it with a single elected leader, but it wouldn’t be functionally the same as a CEO. In a socialist workplace, the leader wouldn’t have absolute authority nor be payed an outrageously unequal wage. The workers would elect them and be able to recall them.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    “We take full responsibility”*

    *Only after being threatened with something worse by Chad Mamdamni

    • SippyCup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      “Shit we got caught. Hey have the social media intern draft an apology that says this was unintentional but that we take full responsibility.”

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      After spending over a million dollars trying to make sure he isn’t elected.

  • YragNitram1956@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Old but still relevant and true. “But there’s a reason. There’s a reason. There’s a reason for this, there’s a reason education SUCKS, and it’s the same reason it will never, ever, EVER be fixed. It’s never going to get any better, don’t look for it, be happy with what you’ve got. Because the owners, the owners of this country don’t want that. I’m talking about the real owners now, the BIG owners! The Wealthy… the REAL owners! The big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians. They are irrelevant. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don’t. You have no choice! You have OWNERS! They OWN YOU. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought, and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls, they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying, to get what they want. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I’ll tell you what they don’t want: They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. That’s against their interests. Thats right. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a kitchen table and think about how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don’t want that! You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers, people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork. And just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shitty jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime and vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it, and now they’re coming for your Social Security money. They want your retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street, and you know something? They’ll get it. They’ll get it all from you sooner or later cause they own this fucking place! It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it! You, and I, are not in the big club. By the way, it’s the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head with their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table has tilted folks. The game is rigged and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care! Good honest hard-working people; white collar, blue collar it doesn’t matter what colour shirt you have on. Good honest hard-working people continue, these are people of modest means, continue to elect these rich cock suckers who don’t give a fuck about you….they don’t give a fuck about you… they don’t give a FUCK about you. They don’t care about you at all… at all… AT ALL. And nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. That’s what the owners count on. The fact that Americans will probably remain willfully ignorant of the big red, white and blue dick that’s being jammed up their assholes everyday, because the owners of this country know the truth. It’s called the American Dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it. George Carlin

  • Carl@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Here’s a reminder that wage theft accounts for nearly 75% of all theft. It’s literally larger than every other form of theft combined, and then multiplied by almost three.

    If you walked into a convenience store and blatantly stole a $2 candy bar at the same time every single day, they’d have a cop waiting for you by the end of the week. But if that same convenience store chain steals $2 in wages from each of their 5000 employees every single day, then that is just good business.

    Part of the issue is that lots of people seem to think “my employer didn’t pay my check” is the only form of wage theft. In reality, wage theft typically happens via a thousand tiny things. Things like unpaid breaks that still require work. Unfair time clock rounding that shaves a fraction of an hour off of every employee’s clock in/clock out times. Managers requiring employees to show up early, and then not allowing them to clock in until their shift is scheduled to begin. Employers automatically deducting an hour of time for meal breaks, (for “convenience”) even if the employee was working during that time and got a shorter break. Employers requiring employees to clock out at the scheduled end of their shift to avoid overtime, then requiring those employees to finish their closing tasks while clocked out. Requiring employees to “always be on-call” but refusing to pay them an on-call fee when they take work calls while clocked out.

    And those are just a few examples. All of those minor things quickly add up to massive amounts of stolen wages. For the employees, it is death by a thousand cuts. No single infraction is large enough to sue over, and no individual employee is going to bother going to court over $2 in unpaid wages. But when the company is doing it at scale, it means every employee is being paid less, which leads to massive illegal profits for the employer.

    • Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Bang on Carl. Did you see Shweddy’s comment above? Thats what I do from time to time to combat the bullshit. I am fortunate to have a job in this economy I’m told. So I do what I must and try to do stuff for myself at work too

  • shweddy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Clock in and steal time. Shit on the clock. Check your local job postings. Use social media. Ask for clarification on that last email. Walk over for clarification. Just sit there.

    • Jhex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      But note these are all good “resistance” strategies, not solutions to the problem

  • myyass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    “You see there are people who believe the function of the police is to fight crime, and that’s not true, the function of the police is social control and protection of property.”

    Michael Parenti

  • ki4jgt@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    As a capitalist, I can stand behind this. Valid criticism.

    If corporations are people, and all people are the same under the law…

      • DegradationDenial@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Communism (not DemSoc) is an economic system where a government essentially owns the population ruled by an autocrat, under the veil of a single union. The ML way of democratic centralism completely fails when the opposition is blocked from voting which assures total enforced hegemony.

        Independent unions are illegal in China with only the All-China Federation of Trade Unions(ACFTU) permitted by the Chinese state and the Chinese Communist Party to operate.

        This doesn’t sound like a good idea.

  • mHtt@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Almost, its about protecting OLIGARCHY not capitalism.

    Capitalism would encourage new ideas and replace old outdated ones.

    Can’t have that. We get status quo because every member of the investment/ownership class needs to pass along their ill gotten gains to prevent their spawn falling into the wage slavery class.

    None of the world leader children actually work, yet all are millionaires. How is that capitalism?

    Same with family empires. One generation founds the company during windfall times and the next few don’t have to work or innovate.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PhqPHQcVeH0

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      (…) not capitalism. (…) the investment/ownership class (…) the wage slavery class. None of the world leader children actually work, yet all are millionaires. How is that capitalism?

      How is it anything but capitalism? What do you call the production mode that allows one class to live off the surplus (labour) value of another?

      Maybe read a book?

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Which book describes a real society that didn’t have an upper class feeding on a lower class? Like which society was that again?

      • pachrist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        You can call that feudalism, among other things.

        But that’s because it’s intentionally hard to tell if it’s feudalism in a capitalist hat or capitalism in a feudalism hat. That’s what oligarchy is.

        Capitalism in itself is private enterprise, which is where capitalism defenders usually start trumpeting that capitalism isn’t actually evil. I think you can maybe make an argument that totally unregulated capitalism isn’t evil, because it’s basically anarchy. But the reality of human greed hits hard and always leads to self-regulation (collusion) and external regulation (coersion), which muddy the waters and lead to oligarchy and feudalism regardless as politicians and businessmen consolidate power.

      • mHtt@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        yes capitalism ALSO requires oversight and competition, not just ownership of the means of production. otherwise its mob rule. We have neither, ergo it’s not capitalism.

        ive read plenty of books and not all are reliable.

        • Urist@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          This is an idealist understanding of what capitalism ought to be, not what it is. This different view is the reason for the contention between us. Most leftists will see capitalism for what it is, not the pipe dream sold to the masses to justify the exploitation of them.

          In marxist terms, the lack of oversight and competition is an inherent trait, a contradiction, within capitalism. The solutions anyone can present are faulty remedies that do not solve the underlying issue at play, which is the property relations with regard to labour.